[ovirt-users] Bugzilla to migrate from f19 to f20 and newer release of oVirt possible?

Alon Bar-Lev alonbl at redhat.com
Sun May 11 20:29:04 UTC 2014



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>, "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>, "users"
> <users at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:22:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Bugzilla to migrate from f19 to f20 and newer release of oVirt possible?
> 
> On 04/14/2014 05:29 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Il 14/04/2014 10:58, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> >> Hello,
> >> are there any plans to make something similar to this one that was for
> >> f18 --> f19 and ovirt 3.2 --> 3.3
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009335
> >
> > We'll prepare that once we're able to support a clean install on F20.
> >
> >> More in general, are there right now particular bugzilla opened and
> >> addressed to enable f20? Or particular blockers that I don't see in
> >> general (perhaps JBoss version?)
> >
> > Sure: Bug 1060198 - [RFE] add support for Fedora 20
> >
> >>   Or do we have to retain that for the future only RHEL/CentOS OS will
> >> be addressed (together with the node isos)?
> >
> > Fedora 20 is quite different from Fedora 19. I guess that once we'll be
> > able to support it as clean install the safest path will be backup /
> > export
> > from F19; clean F20 install, restore / import into F20.
> 
> TBH, maybe we should focus on F21 and skip F20 since its 6 months since
> F20 GA'd.
> wait, F21 is only due october - seems they changed their life cycle from
> the previous 6 months cycle.
> hmmm, we should consider which target makes more sense considering the
> effort each version takes us.

The only real issue is jboss, as the log collector is not actually used and should be made completely optional.

The fact that fedora's jboss is incompatible with us should not make us not provide users service if they like by downloading and extracting upstream jboss to /opt or similar.

I do not see any reason to force users into fedora-19 only because something that is easy to workaround.

> 
> >
> >>
> >> Thaks,
> >> Gianluca
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users at ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 



More information about the Users mailing list