[ovirt-users] Auto-SOLVED, but read anyway : Invalid status on Data Center. Setting status to Non Responsive.

[Itamar Heim]

On 05/14/2014 10:47 AM, Bob Doolittle wrote:
> This bit me as well (for Fedora, however).
>
> There are a whole bunch of ovirt-release variants lying around in
> various parts of the repository that should be cleaned up as they are
> merely "attractive nuisances"
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractive_nuisance_doctrine).
>
> Particularly since the Fedora link (at least) in the Quick Start guide
> is invalid, so it tempts people to look around and use what they find
> that looks plausible to somebody who doesn't know any better :)
>
> It would be helpful if somebody would:
> 1. Clean up the hazardous versions of ovirt-release scattered throughout
> 2. Fix the Quick Start Guide links to point someplace useful for
> ovirt-release

can you please open a bug with details on each of these for tracking?

thanks,
    Itamar

>
> Thanks,
>      Bob
>
> On 05/14/2014 10:33 AM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
>> Le 14/05/2014 15:36, Giorgio Bersano a écrit :
>>>> Following the URL above and the BZ opened by the user
>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072900), I see this
>>>> has been
>>>> corrected in 3.4.1. What gives a perfectly connected NFS export
>>>> domain, but
>>>> empty?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> sorry for jumping late on an old thread, I'm the one reporting that bug.
>>> I have two things to say:
>>> - taking advantage of a rare opportunity to turn off my production
>>> cluster I put it back in that critical situation and I can confirm
>>> that with oVirt 3.4.1 the problem has been solved.
>>>
>>>> PS : I see no 3.4.1 update on CentOS repo.
>>>
>>> - me too, until I installed ovirt-release34.rpm (see
>>> http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4.1_release_notes ). All went smooth
>>> after that.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Giorgio.
>>
>> Thank you Giorgio for taking the time to reply on this.
>>
>> In the end, I understand I have to upgrade, and I will.
>>
>> To the whole team :
>> Looking at the rpm installed on my two oVirt setups, I see that the
>> installed packages are :
>>
>> ovirt-release-el6-8-1.noarch (on CentOS 6.4)
>> and
>> ovirt-release-el6-10.0.1-3.noarch (on CentOS 6.5)
>>
>> The OS are CentOS
>> A "yum search" is showing me that ovirt-release.noarch is available.
>> How do these packages differ?
>> Can I install the ovirt-release.noarch instead of the packages above?
>> Are they aliases?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users