[ovirt-users] separate ovirtmgmt from glusterfs traffic

Federico Alberto Sayd fsayd at uncu.edu.ar
Tue Nov 18 18:00:36 UTC 2014


On 18/11/14 06:25, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my experience, having ovirt traffic on the same nic that gluster 
> can make your platafrom unstable. I was using it for large file 
> storage and gluster has so big traffic that ovirt got confused and 
> started marking hosts as unavailable because of hi latency.
> I've opened an RFE over a year ago, but had no luck with the team to 
> get it done. In the RFE I was asking to have a way in the UI to decide 
> which nic to use for gluster other than the MGMT net that is the one 
> ovirt lets you use.
> There's another way to do this and it's from outside ovirt. There you 
> have to unregister and re register the bricks using gluster console 
> commands. This way, when you register the bricks, you can specify the 
> IP address of the spare NIC and then the traffic will not interfere 
> with the mgmt.
> There's a step that I don't recall much, but ovirt is going to need to 
> know that the bricks are no longer is the mgmt IP, maybe someone else 
> in the list can help with this. I can tell you that if you search the 
> list you'll see my posts about this and the replys of those who helped 
> my back then.
> Regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>

I think that the possibility to add a separate storage network is a 
must. It doesn't make sense Gluster support if you can't separate 
management network traffic of storage network traffic. In 3.5 you can 
define management/vm/display/migration interfaces but not storage 
interfaces.  Why? I don't know. But I think that Gluster support is 
incomplete without exclusive storage networking.

Regards

Federico



More information about the Users mailing list