[ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 status - Go / No Go

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 02/10/2014 00:53, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:42:34PM -0400, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>> To: Users at ovirt.org, devel at ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:46:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 status - Go /	No Go
>>>
>>> Il 29/09/2014 08:34, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> We were supposed to start composing oVirt 3.5.0 GA today 2014-09-29 but we
>>>> still have 3 blockers.
>>>>
>>>> Maintainers:
>>>> - Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot satisfy release criteria[9]
>>>> - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release
>>>> - If any patch must block the GA release please raise the issue as soon as
>>>> possible.
>>>> - If any packages need a rebase please raise the issue as soon as possible.
>>>> - Be aware that packages that doesn't need a rebase must be re-built with
>>>> final release versioning from the RC3 tag.
>>>> - Please provide ETA for new blockers for rescheduling an RC4 and a GA
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> The bug tracker [1] shows 3 blockers:
>>>> Bug ID	Whiteboard	Status	Summary
>>>> 1147085	storage		POST	Memory volumes not deleted when removing a vm with
>>>> snapshots
>>>> 1146073	sla		POST	Failing to Attach a Storage Domain without Disk Profiles
>>>> to a Data Center 3.5
>>>> 1127460	storage		NEW	VM abnormal stop after LV refreshing when using thin
>>>> provisioning on block storage
>>>
>>> Today we have:
>>> Bug ID	Whiteboard	Status	Summary
>>> 1127460	storage		POST	VM abnormal stop after LV refreshing when using thin
>>> provisioning on block storage
>>
>> Basically this is an issue with systemd, not with ovirt. However we have a workaround
>> that we can consume in the short term.
>>
>> Patch for RHEL7: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/33492
>>
>> We believe that we can get the real fix for the underlying component for Fedora quickly.
>> If not, we have a patch ready for enabling the workaround on Fedora.
>>
>> Patch for Fedora: http://http://gerrit.ovirt.org/33555
>>
>>> 1147971	storage		NEW	Snapshot locked after successful live storage migration
>>
>> This is an ifra issue, handled by Ravi.
>>
>>> ETA?
>>
>> Dan?
> 
> We still have nasty selinux-related issues on el7, such as
> 
>     1142454     sanlock not allowed to send SIGTERM or SIGKILL signals
> 
> and surprizes with el6.6 beta
> 
>     1148467     Fail to start VM: libvirtError: Child quit during startup handshake: Input/output error
>     1148432     vdsm fails to start if there is a virbr0 that's attached to an interface
> 
> but I've tagged vdsm v4.16.6 for rc4. Sandro could you take a snapshot
> based on it? (We still have an issue building 3.5's vdsm on Fedora for
> ARM)
> 

Ok, I'll take it, thanks


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com