[ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning

[Itamar Heim]

On 09/13/2014 03:38 PM, Mohyedeen Nazzal wrote:
> One more thing,,
>
> Being able to attach USB dongles from the admin portal...

like the hostusb vdsm hook allows?

>
> Thanks,
> Mohyedeen.
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mohyedeen Nazzal
> <mohyedeen.nazzal at gmail.com <mailto:mohyedeen.nazzal at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     When VMs goes to unknown status, all control options are grayed, and
>     the only way to fix this is to update the Database manually, it will
>     be nice to be able to force the engine to poweroff the VM from admin
>     portal.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Mohyedeen.
>
>     On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com
>     <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         > From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske at mittwald.de <mailto:s.kieske at mittwald.de>>
>         > To:users at ovirt.org <mailto:users at ovirt.org>
>         > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:53:46 PM
>         > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning
>         >
>         > +1!
>         >
>         > I really would like to see a fast working way to create, manage
>         > and use ceph in ovirt. I don't know if implementation through
>         > openstack component is enough, because you will need more components
>         > then (keystone for auth e.g.).
>
>         Sure you will need more components, but we don't want to
>         duplicate the effort,
>         implementing ceph support directly in ovirt. Using Cinder we can
>         reuse the
>         existing ceph support, and gain also support for other Cinder
>         drivers for
>         free.
>
>         On the host side, we will have of course ceph specific support,
>         so you will
>         be able to create ceph volumes directly, and use vdsm api to
>         start vms using
>         these volumes, if you want more "direct" support.
>
>         I think this is the general long term approach; integrate
>         openstack components
>         instead of re-implementing the wheel.
>
>          >
>          > On 12/09/14 15:34, Cédric Buot de l'Epine wrote:
>          > > Dunno if CephFS efforts will be sustainable against
>         Glusterfs...
>          > > I'm not sure if a posix fs is the best provider for blocks.
>          > > I would be pleased to have a direct form to create a Ceph
>         pool for a
>          > > datacenter, then provide librbd path for the guests (or
>         only their size).
>          >
>          > --
>          > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
>          >
>          > Sven Kieske
>          >
>          > Systemadministrator
>          > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
>          > Königsberger Straße 6
>          > 32339 Espelkamp
>          > T: +49-5772-293-100 <tel:%2B49-5772-293-100>
>          > F: +49-5772-293-333 <tel:%2B49-5772-293-333>
>          > https://www.mittwald.de
>          > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
>          > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG
>         Bad Oeynhausen
>          > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG
>         Bad Oeynhausen
>          > _______________________________________________
>          > Users mailing list
>          > Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
>          > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>          >
>         _______________________________________________
>         Users mailing list
>         Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
>         http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>