[ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] Building vdsm within Fedora

Federico Simoncelli fsimonce at redhat.com
Wed Sep 24 09:07:23 UTC 2014


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce at redhat.com>
> Cc: devel at ovirt.org, "users" <users at ovirt.org>, "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske at mittwald.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:01:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Building vdsm within Fedora
> 
> Il 24/09/2014 10:35, Federico Simoncelli ha scritto:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske at mittwald.de>
> >> To: devel at ovirt.org, "users" <users at ovirt.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:44:17 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Building vdsm within Fedora
> >>
> >> On 24/09/14 09:13, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
> >>> You probably missed the first part "we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in
> >>> the spec file". In that case you won't fail in any requirement.
> >>>
> >>> Basically the question is: was there any problem on centos6 before
> >>> committing http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214 ?
> >>
> >> Of course there was a problem, please follow the link in this very
> >> commit to the according bugzilla:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127763
> >>
> >> In short: you can not use live snapshots without this updated spec file.
> >>
> >> And it's a PITA to install this package by hand, you must track
> >> it's versions yourself etc pp. you basically lose all the stuff
> >> a proper spec file gives you.
> > 
> > As soon as you have the ovirt repository installed there shouldn't be any
> > reason for you to have any of these problems.
> > 
> > Sandro, is there any reason why the rpm available here:
> > 
> > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4/rpm/el6/x86_64/
> > 
> > are not published here?
> > 
> > http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.4/rpm/el6/x86_64/
> 
> this second link points to the previous layout, abandoned since we moved from
> /releases to /pub.
> /releases is still around for historical purpose, I think we should consider
> to drop it at some point avoinding confusion or renaming it to something
> that make it clear that it shouldn't be used anymore.

Sven can you let us know if you still have any problem using:

http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release34.rpm
(which should contain the correct ovirt.repo)

Thanks,
-- 
Federico



More information about the Users mailing list