[ovirt-users] R: Re: Network instability after upgrade 3.6.0 -> 3.6.1

Stefano Danzi s.danzi at hawai.it
Wed Dec 30 20:39:12 UTC 2015


Hi Dan,
some info about my network setup:

- My bond is used only for VM networking. ovirtmgmt has a dedicated 
ethernet card.
- I haven't set any ethtool opts.
- Nics on bond specs:
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network 
Connection
         Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Motherboard
         Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16
         Memory at df200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
         I/O ports at e000 [size=32]
         Memory at df220000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
         Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2
         Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
         Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
         Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=5 Masked-
         Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
         Kernel driver in use: e1000e

[root at ovirt01 ~]# ifconfig
DMZ: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 43546  bytes 2758816 (2.6 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

LAN_HAW: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 2090262  bytes 201078292 (191.7 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 86  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 2408059  bytes 456371629 (435.2 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 185  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 118966  bytes 14862549 (14.1 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

bond0.1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 2160985  bytes 210157656 (200.4 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

bond0.3: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 151195  bytes 185253584 (176.6 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 118663  bytes 13857950 (13.2 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

enp4s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 708141  bytes 95034564 (90.6 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 16714  bytes 5193108 (4.9 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
         device interrupt 16  memory 0xdf200000-df220000

enp5s0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 1699934  bytes 361339105 (344.5 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 102252  bytes 9669441 (9.2 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
         device interrupt 17  memory 0xdf100000-df120000

enp6s1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 2525232  bytes 362345893 (345.5 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 388452  bytes 208145492 (198.5 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
         inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
         loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
         RX packets 116465661  bytes 1515059255942 (1.3 TiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 116465661  bytes 1515059255942 (1.3 TiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

ovirtmgmt: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         inet 192.168.1.50  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 
192.168.1.255
         txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 3784298  bytes 555536509 (529.8 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 86  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 1737669  bytes 1401650369 (1.3 GiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

vnet0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 500  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 558574  bytes 107521742 (102.5 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 1316892  bytes 487764500 (465.1 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

vnet1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 500  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 42282  bytes 7373007 (7.0 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 40498  bytes 17598215 (16.7 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

vnet2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         txqueuelen 500  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 79388  bytes 16807917 (16.0 MiB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 164596  bytes 183858757 (175.3 MiB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0



  cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

Bonding Mode: load balancing (xor)
Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: enp4s0
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Slave queue ID: 0

Slave Interface: enp5s0
MII Status: up
Speed: 1000 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 0
Slave queue ID: 0


Il 2015-12-30 10:44 Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:

> Hi Jon and Stefano,
> 
> We've been testing bond mode 4 with (an earlier)
> kernel-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 and experienced no such behaviour.
> 
> However, to better identify the suspected kernel bug, could you provide
> more information regarding your network connectivity?
> 
> What is the make of your NICs? Which driver do you use?
> 
> Do you set special ethtool opts (LRO with bridge was broken in 7.2.0
> kernel if I am not mistaken)?
> 
> You have the ovirtmgmt bridge on top of your bond, right?
> 
> Can you share your ifcfg*?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list