[ovirt-users] Can´t use a VM Network VLAN, because the Virtual Machines inside can't reach the Gateway

Julián Tete danteconrad14 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 21:51:57 UTC 2015


Don't work.... :'(

I'm going to try this:




*https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027>*

2015-07-02 11:40 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>:

> I'm going to erase everything and the try this:
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/QA:TestCase_Hosted_Engine_Tagged_VLAN_Support
>
> 2015-07-02 10:41 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>:
>
>> I tried a different Aproach:
>>
>> One VLAN for each NIC
>>
>> I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway
>> after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home.
>> Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.
>>
>> I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine
>> can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.
>>
>> After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.
>>
>> This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:
>>
>> DATA CENTERS
>>
>> Logical Networks:
>> -----------
>> Name: ovirtmgmt
>> Description: Management Network
>> Network Label: 1
>> MTU: Default
>> -----------
>> Name: dmz
>> Description: VLAN 50
>> Network Label: 50
>> Enable VLAN tagging: 50
>> VM network
>> MTU: Default
>> -----------
>> Name: Hosting
>> Description: VLAN 100
>> Network Label: 100
>> Enable VLAN tagging: 100
>> VM network
>> MTU: Default
>> ------------
>>
>> CLUSTERS
>>
>> Logical Networks
>>
>> ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network
>> dmz         Assign
>> Hosting    Assign Required
>>
>> HOSTS
>>
>> Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
>> Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63
>>
>> Network Interfaces
>>
>> HOSTS     BOND      VLAN            NETWORK NAME    ADDRESS
>> MAC                       SPEED(Mbps)    RX(Mbps)       TX(Mbps)
>>
>> eno1                                             * ovirtmgmt
>> 192.168.0.63           00:17:a4:77:00:18     10000                 <
>> 1           < 1
>>
>> eno2                eno2.50 (50)              dmz
>> 192.168.50.8          00:17:a4:77:00:1a     10000                  <
>> 1           < 1
>>
>> ens1f0             ens1f0.100 (100)        Hosting
>> 192.168.100.7        00:17:a4:77:00:1c      10000                  <
>> 1           < 1
>>
>> ens1f1
>> 00:17:a4:77:00:1e     0                         < 1           < 1
>>
>> Setup Hosts Networks
>>
>> Network: ovirtmgmt
>> Static
>> IP: 192.168.0.63
>> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
>> Gateway: 192.168.0.1
>> Custom Properties: No available keys
>> Sync network: Yes
>>
>> Network: dmz
>> Static
>> IP: 192.168.50.8
>> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
>> Gateway: 192.168.50.1
>> Custom Properties: Please select a key...
>>
>> Network: Hosting
>> Static
>> IP: 192.168.100.7
>> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240
>> Gateway: 192.168.100.1
>> Custom Properties: Please select a key...
>>
>> Virtual Machines
>>
>> Name: PruebaVLAN
>> Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
>>
>> Edit Network Interface
>>
>> Name: nic1
>> Profile: dmz/dmz
>> Type: VirtIO
>> Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00
>> Link State: Up
>> Card Status: Plugged
>>
>> Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:
>>
>> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
>>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master
>> ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP
>> qlen 1000
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP
>> qlen 1000
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> 6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
>>     link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> 7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
>>     link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> 10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500
>>     link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 17: eno2.50 at eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
>> noqueue master dmz state UP
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 19: ens1f0.100 at ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
>> noqueue master Hosting state UP
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
>> state UP
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>> 21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
>> state UP
>>     link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>     inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>     inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
>>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>
>> 2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> You can count on it :)
>>>
>>> 2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>
>>>> Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged
>>>> and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue.
>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the
>>>>>> switch.
>>>>>> Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged
>>>>>> traffic.
>>>>>> As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and
>>>>>> trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports.
>>>>>> Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or
>>>>>> must you be able to pass both on the same interface.
>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the
>>>>>>> mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about
>>>>>>> oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol
>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the
>>>>>>>>> Gateway and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter
>>>>>>>>> from VMware.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things
>>>>>>>>>> out VM>host>switch>rtr
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have already confirmed VM to host.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't
>>>>>>>>>> miss anything
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the explanation :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the
>>>>>>>>>>> Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host
>>>>>>>>>>> can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of
>>>>>>>>>>> the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right
>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interface in the host ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagging at the host.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danteconrad14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Donny
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestion ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny at cloudspin.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Friends of oVirt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VLANs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the external IPs from the net range,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine, and nothing changes...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the company.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For any idea, thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users at ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150702/a07d9638/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list