[ovirt-users] R: R: R: R: R: R: R: PXE boot of a VM on vdsm don't read DHCP offer

NUNIN Roberto Roberto.Nunin at comifar.it
Wed Jul 8 16:13:21 UTC 2015



> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com]
> Inviato: mercoledì 8 luglio 2015 08:12
> A: Dan Kenigsberg
> Cc: NUNIN Roberto; users at ovirt.org; ibarkan at redhat.com
> Oggetto: Re: R: R: R: R: R: [ovirt-users] R: PXE boot of a VM on vdsm don't read
> DHCP offer
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:14:54AM +0200, NUNIN Roberto wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:33:59AM +0200, NUNIN Roberto wrote:
> > > > > Hi Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for question: what do you mean for interface vnetxxxx ?
> > > > > Currently our path is :
> > > > > eno1 - eno2  ---- bond0 ----- bond.3500 (VLAN) ------ bridge ----- vm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which one of these ?
> > > > > Moreover, reading Fabian statements about bonding limits, today I
> can try
> > > > to switch to a config without bonding.
> > > >
> > > > "vm" is a complicated term.
> > > >
> > > > `brctl show` would not show you a "vm" connected to a bridge. When
> you
> > > > WOULD see is a vnet888 tap device. The "other side" of this device is
> > > > held by qemu, which implement the VM.
> > >
> > > Ok, understood and found it, vnet2
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm asking if the dhcp offer has reached that tap device.
> > >
> > > No, the DHCP offer packet do not reach the vnet2 interface, I can see only
> DHCP DISCOVER.
> >
> > Ok, so it seems that we have a problem in the host bridging.
> >
> > Is it the latest kernel-3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 ?
> >
> > Michael, a DHCP DISCOVER is sent out of a just-booted guest, and OFFER
> > returns to the bridge, but is not propagated to the tap device.
> > Can you suggest how to debug this further?
>
> Dump packets including the ethernet headers.

I have both tcpdump capture, on the bridge interface and on the vnet interface.

How I can upload output files ?
Sorry for probably obvious question, first time for me :)

Roberto Nunin
> Likely something interfered with them so the eth address is wrong.
>
> Since bonding does this sometimes, this is the most likely culprit.
>
> --
> MST

Questo messaggio e' indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato e potrebbe contenere informazioni confidenziali, riservate o proprietarie. Qualora la presente venisse ricevuta per errore, si prega di segnalarlo immediatamente al mittente, cancellando l'originale e ogni sua copia e distruggendo eventuali copie cartacee. Ogni altro uso e' strettamente proibito e potrebbe essere fonte di violazione di legge.

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately, deleting the original and all copies and destroying any hard copies. Any other use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.



More information about the Users mailing list