[ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] ovirt-engine-sdk-python too slow
Juan Hernández
jhernand at redhat.com
Mon Nov 30 09:21:03 UTC 2015
On 11/29/2015 09:57 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> So is this a bug or something?
>
> Can I do something to fix the bug?
>
> btw, adding Michael Pasternak
>
It is this bug:
[RFE][performance] - generate large scale list running to slow.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1221238
We don't have any concrete plans to fix it.
You can try to fix it yourself, but it is in a very fragile part of the
SDK, chances of causing regressions are very high. I'd rather suggest
you to avoid calling the SDK multiple times, or just avoid the SDK and
use some other solution.
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com
> <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks John, very interesting results.
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:17 AM, John Hunter <zhjwpku at gmail.com
> <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Juan Hernández
> <jhernand at redhat.com <mailto:jhernand at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11/25/2015 06:45 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > $ ./profile-stats -c myscript.prof
> >
> > Wed Nov 25 10:40:11 2015 myscript.prof
> >
> > 7892315 function calls (7891054 primitive calls)
> in 7.940 seconds
> >
> > Ordered by: internal time
> > List reduced from 1518 to 20 due to restriction <20>
> >
> > ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall
> filename:lineno(function)
> > 9086 2.693 0.000 6.706 0.001
> inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> > 1952494 1.394 0.000 1.880 0.000
> inspect.py:59(isclass)
> > 9092 1.030 0.000 1.030 0.000 {dir}
> > 1952642 0.600 0.000 0.600 0.000 {getattr}
> > 1972765 0.504 0.000 0.504 0.000 {isinstance}
> > 3 0.334 0.111 0.334 0.111 {method
> 'perform' of
> > 'pycurl.Curl' objects}
> > 1883918 0.284 0.000 0.284 0.000 {method
> 'append' of 'list'
> > objects}
> > 9087 0.221 0.000 0.221 0.000 {method
> 'sort' of 'list'
> > objects}
> > 9051 0.172 0.000 6.911 0.001
> > reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember)
> > 1 0.124 0.124 0.354 0.354
> errors.py:17(<module>)
> > 1 0.088 0.088 0.230 0.230
> params.py:8(<module>)
> > 8879 0.070 0.000 6.998 0.001
> params.py:367(__setattr__)
> > 1 0.047 0.047 5.182 5.182
> api.py:23(<module>)
> > 1 0.025 0.025 4.743 4.743
> brokers.py:22(<module>)
> > 1 0.023 0.023 0.030 0.030
> > connectionspool.py:17(<module>)
> > 1 0.022 0.022 0.053 0.053
> > lxml.etree.pyx:1(PyMODINIT_FUNC PyInit_etree(void))
> > 118 0.019 0.000 4.684 0.040
> params.py:45277(__init__)
> > 5 0.015 0.003 0.024 0.005 {built-in
> method strptime}
> > 1 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.013
> socket.py:45(<module>)
> > 10 0.011 0.001 0.015 0.002
> collections.py:288(namedtuple)
> >
> > So it is not the classes, it is the code inspecting them
> on import.
> >
>
> The script doesn't contain only the imports, it is also
> calling the
> server, and we know parsing the result is slow, due to the
> excesive use
> of "inspect", as I mentioned before:
>
> [RFE][performance] - generate large scale list running to
> slow.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221238#c2
>
> In the profiling information seems to corresponds to the
> script before
> commenting out the part that lists all the VMs, as it looks
> like the
> constructor of the VM class was called 21 times (you
> probably have 21 VMs):
>
> 21 0.004 1.308
> build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/brokers.py:29139(VM)
>
> Actually I only have one VM running on the server.
> This time it contains only the import in the script, not calling
> the server. It shows:
> 21 0.005 1.666 brokers.py:29139(VM)
>
> $./profile-stats -c myscript_contains_only_import.prof
>
> Thu Nov 26 09:11:59 2015 myscript_contains_only_import.prof
>
> 5453977 function calls (5452849 primitive calls) in
> 5.463 seconds
>
> Ordered by: internal time
> List reduced from 1083 to 20 due to restriction <20>
>
> ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall
> filename:lineno(function)
> 7468 2.029 0.000 4.914 0.001
> inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> 1348678 0.975 0.000 1.342 0.000 inspect.py:59(isclass)
> 7474 0.737 0.000 0.737 0.000 {dir}
> 1348825 0.433 0.000 0.433 0.000 {getattr}
> 1365970 0.383 0.000 0.383 0.000 {isinstance}
> 1293455 0.211 0.000 0.211 0.000 {method 'append'
> of 'list' objects}
> 7469 0.163 0.000 0.163 0.000 {method 'sort' of
> 'list' objects}
> 7434 0.139 0.000 5.082 0.001
> reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember)
> 7670 0.061 0.000 5.158 0.001
> params.py:367(__setattr__)
> 1 0.043 0.043 5.463 5.463 api.py:23(<module>)
> 1 0.042 0.042 0.139 0.139 errors.py:17(<module>)
> 1 0.027 0.027 5.248 5.248
> brokers.py:22(<module>)
> 1 0.026 0.026 0.097 0.097 params.py:8(<module>)
> 118 0.023 0.000 5.187 0.044
> params.py:45277(__init__)
> 1 0.018 0.018 0.025 0.025
> connectionspool.py:17(<module>)
> 1 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 socket.py:45(<module>)
> 10 0.010 0.001 0.013 0.001
> collections.py:288(namedtuple)
> 13637 0.009 0.000 0.009 0.000 {method 'lower' of
> 'str' objects}
> 35 0.009 0.000 0.035 0.001
> reflectionhelper.py:28(getClasses)
> 173/27 0.008 0.000 0.019 0.001
> sre_parse.py:388(_parse)
>
>
> Ordered by: internal time
> List reduced from 1083 to 20 due to restriction <20>
>
> Function was called by...
> ncalls tottime cumtime
> inspect.py:247(getmembers) <- 35 0.009
> 0.022 reflectionhelper.py:28(getClasses)
> 7433 2.019
> 4.891 reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember)
> inspect.py:59(isclass) <- 1348678 0.975
> 1.342 inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> {dir} <- 7468 0.737
> 0.737 inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> 1 0.000
> 0.000 os.py:35(_get_exports_list)
> 4 0.000
> 0.000 ssl.py:111(_import_symbols)
> 1 0.000
> 0.000 tokenize.py:23(<module>)
> {getattr} <- 1 0.000
> 0.000 <string>:1(<module>)
> 19 0.000
> 0.000 abc.py:86(__new__)
> 48 0.000
> 0.000 abc.py:89(<genexpr>)
> 8 0.000
> 0.000 abc.py:148(__subclasscheck__)
> 5 0.000
> 0.000 functools.py:17(update_wrapper)
> 1348678 0.433
> 0.433 inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> 16 0.000
> 0.000 socket.py:45(<module>)
> 50 0.000
> 0.000 ssl.py:111(_import_symbols)
> {isinstance} <- 1 0.000
> 0.000 __init__.py:49(normalize_encoding)
> 1 0.000
> 0.000 __init__.py:71(search_function)
> 8 0.000
> 0.000 abc.py:105(register)
> 10 0.000
> 0.000 collections.py:288(namedtuple)
> 1348678 0.367
> 0.367 inspect.py:59(isclass)
> 15576 0.015
> 0.015 params.py:367(__setattr__)
> 24 0.000
> 0.000 re.py:230(_compile)
> 60 0.000
> 0.000 sre_compile.py:546(isstring)
> 1608 0.001
> 0.001 sre_parse.py:139(__getitem__)
> 4 0.000
> 0.000 warnings.py:46(filterwarnings)
> {method 'append' of 'list' objects} <- 1288934 0.210
> 0.210 inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> 8 0.000
> 0.000 opcode.py:5(<module>)
> 11 0.000
> 0.000 opcode.py:31(name_op)
> 6 0.000
> 0.000 opcode.py:35(jrel_op)
> 6 0.000
> 0.000 opcode.py:39(jabs_op)
> 2294 0.001
> 0.001 sre_compile.py:64(_compile)
> 575 0.000
> 0.000 sre_compile.py:228(_compile_charset)
> 416 0.000
> 0.000 sre_compile.py:256(_optimize_charset)
> 132 0.000
> 0.000 sre_compile.py:433(_compile_info)
> 24 0.000
> 0.000 sre_compile.py:552(_code)
> 60 0.000
> 0.000 sre_parse.py:72(opengroup)
> 485 0.000
> 0.000 sre_parse.py:147(append)
> 175 0.000
> 0.000 sre_parse.py:310(_parse_sub)
> 329 0.000
> 0.000 sre_parse.py:388(_parse)
> {method 'sort' of 'list' objects} <- 1 0.000
> 0.000 base64.py:3(<module>)
> 7468 0.163
> 0.163 inspect.py:247(getmembers)
> reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember) <- 7434 0.139
> 5.082 params.py:367(__setattr__)
> params.py:367(__setattr__) <- 236 0.003
> 0.206 params.py:6749(__init__)
> 944 0.007
> 0.571 params.py:6836(__init__)
> 6490 0.051
> 4.381 params.py:45277(__init__)
> api.py:23(<module>) <- 1 0.043
> 5.463 myscript_contains_only_import.py:3(<module>)
> errors.py:17(<module>) <- 1 0.042
> 0.139 api.py:23(<module>)
> brokers.py:22(<module>) <- 1 0.027
> 5.248 api.py:23(<module>)
> params.py:8(<module>) <- 1 0.026
> 0.097 errors.py:17(<module>)
> params.py:45277(__init__) <- 1 0.000
> 0.007 brokers.py:256(Cluster)
> 3 0.000
> 0.022 brokers.py:988(ClusterGlusterHook)
> 12 0.001
> 0.090 brokers.py:1228(ClusterGlusterVolume)
> 1 0.000
> 0.008 brokers.py:1631(ClusterGlusterVolumeGlusterBrick)
> 1 0.000
> 0.011 brokers.py:3183(DataCenter)
> 1 0.000
> 0.011 brokers.py:3271(DataCenterCluster)
> 3 0.000
> 0.038 brokers.py:3999(DataCenterClusterGlusterHook)
> 12 0.002
> 0.155 brokers.py:4234(DataCenterClusterGlusterVolume)
> 1 0.000
> 0.013 brokers.py:4594(DataCenterClusterGlusterVolumeGlusterBrick)
> 2 0.002
> 0.050 brokers.py:9475(DataCenterStorageDomain)
> 3 0.000
> 0.073 brokers.py:9578(DataCenterStorageDomainDisk)
> 3 0.000
> 0.079 brokers.py:10455(Disk)
> 2 0.000
> 0.061 brokers.py:11899(ExternalHostProvider)
> 15 0.003
> 0.546 brokers.py:13663(Host)
> 2 0.001
> 0.095 brokers.py:15163(HostNIC)
> 1 0.000
> 0.045 brokers.py:15634(HostNICs)
> 2 0.000
> 0.104 brokers.py:18386(Job)
> 1 0.000
> 0.050 brokers.py:18464(JobStep)
> 2 0.000
> 0.104 brokers.py:20102(OpenStackImageProvider)
> 1 0.000
> 0.052 brokers.py:20371(OpenStackImageProviderOpenStackImage)
> 2 0.000
> 0.106 brokers.py:20641(OpenStackNetworkProvider)
> 2 0.000
> 0.109 brokers.py:21324(OpenStackVolumeProvider)
> 1 0.000
> 0.063 brokers.py:23499(StorageConnection)
> 2 0.001
> 0.125 brokers.py:23706(StorageDomain)
> 3 0.001
> 0.173 brokers.py:23871(StorageDomainDisk)
> 1 0.000
> 0.060 brokers.py:24962(StorageDomainImage)
> 2 0.000
> 0.125 brokers.py:25499(StorageDomainTemplate)
> 2 0.000
> 0.138 brokers.py:25857(StorageDomainVM)
> 1 0.000
> 0.076 brokers.py:26550(Template)
> 3 0.001
> 0.227 brokers.py:26852(TemplateDisk)
> * 21 0.005
> 1.666 brokers.py:29139(VM)*
> 5 0.001
> 0.375 brokers.py:30244(VMDisk)
> 2 0.000
> 0.146 brokers.py:31461(VMNIC)
> 1 0.000
> 0.088 brokers.py:32478(VMSnapshot)
> 1 0.000
> 0.096 brokers.py:34300(VmPool)
> connectionspool.py:17(<module>) <- 1 0.018
> 0.025 api.py:23(<module>)
> socket.py:45(<module>) <- 1 0.013
> 0.013 urllib.py:23(<module>)
> collections.py:288(namedtuple) <- 6 0.005
> 0.007 inspect.py:25(<module>)
> 2 0.003
> 0.003 ssl.py:88(<module>)
> 2 0.002
> 0.003 urlparse.py:29(<module>)
> {method 'lower' of 'str' objects} <- 6202 0.004
> 0.004 reflectionhelper.py:28(getClasses)
> 7434 0.006
> 0.006 reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember)
> 1 0.000
> 0.000 socket.py:45(<module>)
> reflectionhelper.py:28(getClasses) <- 35 0.009
> 0.035 reflectionhelper.py:51(isModuleMember)
> sre_parse.py:388(_parse) <- 173/27 0.008
> 0.019 sre_parse.py:310(_parse_sub)
>
>
>
> > Nir
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:49 AM, John Hunter <zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nir,
> >
> > Attachment is my script and its profile.
> > Thanks a lot about your help!
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com>
> > <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, John Hunter <zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Juan Hernández
> > <jhernand at redhat.com <mailto:jhernand at redhat.com>
> <mailto:jhernand at redhat.com <mailto:jhernand at redhat.com>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/24/2015 01:40 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali at redhat.com <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com>
> <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com>>
> > > <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com
> <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com> <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com
> <mailto:oourfali at redhat.com>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I discussed it with Juan (cc-ed).
> > >
> > > There used to be a bug in the JDBC
> authenticion extension that
> > > artificially delayed RESTAPI
> responses by 5 seconds:
> > >
> > > brute force prevention login delay
> should not be applied to successful
> > > login requests
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1255814
> > >
> > > That matches the description of the
> issue, but in theory it has been
> > > fixed. I would suggest him to check
> that he is using the right version
> > > of the extension.
> > >
> > > I did not use the extension
> ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-jdbc, and I don't
> > > think this bug matches my problem,
> because even there is only one line
> > > in the python script, it still cost like
> 3 seconds, I don't think this is a
> > > reasonable time as when I import other
> package, it cost almost no time.
> > >
> > > Can you explain why this import line
> costs so much time?
> > >
> >
> > If you are using 3.6 then you are using
> > ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-jdbc,
> > as it is enabled by default, but looks
> like it isn't
> > related to your
> > problem.
> >
> > That line takes a long time to execute
> because it has to
> > process two
> > large Python modules: the "params" module
> that contains
> > a class per each
> > type used by the API (393 classes) and the
> "brokers"
> > module that
> > contains a class per each resource used by
> the API (358
> > classes). That
> > makes a total of 751 classes. In my
> environment it takes
> > 0.9 seconds,
> > approx. You may want to use the python
> profile in your
> > environment and
> > share the results:
> >
> > $ cat > profile.py <<.
> > import cProfile
> > cProfile.run("from ovirtsdk.api import API")
> > .
> >
> > $ python profile.py
> >
> > I won't be surprised to see this taking
> those 3 seconds
> > in a slower
> > environment.
> >
> > But even if this takes those 3 seconds it
> shouldn't be a
> > big problem,
> > because you shouldn't be running that
> "from ... import
> > ..." line
> > frequently. Your program should do this
> once only, when
> > it starts.
> >
> > Assume that I have two functions to implement,
> one is to
> > list all the vms belong
> > to the user, and the other is to retrieve one vm's
> > virt-viewer connection file, as
> > far as I can see, I have to write two python
> scripts and
> > import the ovirtsdk.api in both
> > scripts, each script has to take the 3 seconds :(
> >
> >
> > No, you have two functions, which can be in the
> same module, or
> > in different modules, depending on how you want to
> organize your
> > code.
> >
> > Python imports are done only once, on the first
> time you import
> > a module anywhere. The module is stored in
> sys.modules, and the
> > next import fetch the module object from sys.modules.
> >
> > Can you share a profile of a simple script
> importing the Python sdk?
> >
> > Do:
> >
> > python -m cProfile -o myscript.prof myscript.py
> >
> > The profile will be stored in myscript.prof.
> >
> > For viewing the profile, I recommend to use the
> profile-stats tool:
> >
> https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/blob/master/contrib/profile-stats
> >
> >
> >
> > How can I run the "from ... import ..." just
> once ?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > In addition we also know that
> retrieving large lists of objects with the
> > > SDK is slow:
> > >
> > > [RFE][performance] - generate
> large scale list running to slow.
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1221238
> > >
> > > We don't have a solution for that yet.
> > >
> > > CC-ing Juan in case you have
> additional questions.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM,
> John Hunter <zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>
> <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com
> <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com> <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com
> <mailto:zhjwpku at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I am using the
> ovirt-engine-sdk-python to communicate with the
> > > ovirt-engine,
> > > I am ok to list the vms but the
> processing time is too long,
> > > like 4.5 seconds,
> > > and this line:
> > > from ovirtsdk.api import API
> > > take almost 3 seconds.
> > >
> > > This seems a little bit longer
> than I expected it to be, so I am
> > > asking is there
> > > a quicker way to communicate
> with the ovirt-engine?
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea
> 3, planta
> 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 -
> Red Hat S.L.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Junwang Zhao
> Department of Computer Science &Technology
> Peking University
> Beijing, 100871, PRC
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Junwang Zhao
> Department of Computer Science &Technology
> Peking University
> Beijing, 100871, PRC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.
More information about the Users
mailing list