[ovirt-users] [ANN] oVirt 3.6.1 First Release Candidate is now available for testing

[jvdwege]

Sandro Bonazzola schreef op 2015-11-30 15:10:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Joop <jvdwege at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> On 30-11-2015 13:06, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Joop <jvdwege at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> On 25-11-2015 15:28, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>> The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability
>>> of the First Release Candidate of oVirt 3.6.1 for testing, as of
>>> November 25th, 2015.
>>> 
>>> This release is available now for Fedora 22,
>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.7, CentOS Linux 6.7 (or similar) and
>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux >= 7.1, CentOS Linux >= 7.1 (or similar).
>>> 
>>> This release supports Hypervisor Hosts running
>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux >= 7.1, CentOS Linux >= 7.1 (or similar)
>> and
>>> Fedora 22.
>>> Highly experimental support for Debian 8.1 Jessie has been added
>> too.
>>> 
>>> This release of oVirt 3.6.1 includes numerous bug fixes.
>>> See the release notes [1] for an initial list of the new features
>> and bugs
>>> fixed.
>>> 
>> Tried the 3.6.1 prerelease but the sanlock error 22 is still there
>> and
>> its not possible to activate the imported hosted-engine storage
>> domain.
>> Host F22, hosted-engine CentOS7.1, storage domain(s) NFS.
>> 
>> Sanlock error 22 shows up because  BZ 1269768 hasn't been fixed yet.
>> 
>> But if you don't import the hosted engine storage everything else
>> should still work fine.
>  Ah, but that won't work for my use case since I need to import an
> existing data domain and that won't work without a working data
> domain.
> Will see if creating a dummy small data domain will let me import the
> real one.
> 
> it should, let me know if it didn't work.
Thanks that worked :-)

> Adding Simone and Roy so they have a better sight on why people are
> keep trying to import the hosted engine domain despite it's not fixed
> yet :-)
Sorry being pushy just wanted to get on with my ovirt stuff and felt a 
little frustrated that such a basic feature didn't work (IMHO).
Again apologies, you're all working hard to get things fixed and I 
shouldn't complain.

Regards,

Joop