[ovirt-users] Automatically migrate VM between hosts in the same cluster

Alex Crow acrow at integrafin.co.uk
Fri Sep 18 06:50:59 UTC 2015



On 18/09/15 07:30, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> thank you very much for your answers.
>
> So:
>
> 1)Of course, we have UPS. More than one, in our server room, and of 
> course they will send an advice to the host if they are on battery
>

Good.

> 2)My question was: “what can I do, so that in case of Kernel Panic or 
> similar, the VM will be migrated (live or not) to another host?”
>

You would make the VMs HA and acquire a fencing solution.

> 3)I’d like to have a shutdown-script on the host that put the host in 
> Maintenance and wait until it’s done, so that I can just shutdown or 
> reboot it without any other action. Is it possible? It would help to 
> manage the power failure, too, assuming that other hosts have better 
> UPS (it can be possible…)
>

You could probably use the REST API on the Ovirt Engine for that.But it 
might be better to have a highly available machine (VM or not) running 
something like Nagios or Icinga which would perform the monitoring of 
your hosts and connect to the REST API to perform maintenance and 
shutdown. You might also consider a UPS service like NUT (unless you're 
already doing it).

Cheers

Alex

> Thanks a lot
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Luca Bertoncello
>
> -- 
> Besuchen Sie unsere Webauftritte:
>
> www.queo.biz <http://www.queo.biz/>
>
> 	
>
> Agentur für Markenführung und Kommunikation
>
> www.queoflow.com <http://www.queoflow.com/>
>
> 	
>
> IT-Consulting und Individualsoftwareentwicklung
>
>
> Luca Bertoncello
> Administrator
>
> Telefon:
>
> 	
>
> +49 351 21 30 38 0
>
> Fax:
>
> 	
>
> +49 351 21 30 38 99
>
> E-Mail:
>
> 	
>
> l.bertoncello at queo-group.com <mailto:l.bertoncello at queo-group.com>
>
>
> queo GmbH
> Tharandter Str. 13
> 01159 Dresden
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Dresden
> Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Dresden HRB 22352
> Geschäftsführer: Rüdiger Henke, André Pinkert
> USt-IdNr.: DE234220077
>
> *From:*users-bounces at ovirt.org [mailto:users-bounces at ovirt.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *matthew lagoe
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2015 9:56 PM
> *To:* 'Alex Crow'; 'Yaniv Kaul'
> *Cc:* users at ovirt.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Automatically migrate VM between hosts in 
> the same cluster
>
> There are PDU’s that you can monitor power draw per port and that 
> would kind of tell you if a PSU failed as the load would be 0
>
> *From:*users-bounces at ovirt.org <mailto:users-bounces at ovirt.org> 
> [mailto:users-bounces at ovirt.org] *On Behalf Of *Alex Crow
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:31 PM
> *To:* Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com <mailto:ykaul at redhat.com>>
> *Cc:* users at ovirt.org <mailto:users at ovirt.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Automatically migrate VM between hosts in 
> the same cluster
>
> I don't really think this is practical:
>
>     - If the PSU failed, your UPS could alert you. If you have one...
>
>
> If you have only one PSU in a host, a UPS is not going to stop you 
> losing all the VMs on that host. OK, if you had N+1 PSUs, you may be 
> able to monitor for this (IPMI/LOM/DRAC etc)and use the API to put a 
> host into maintenance. Also a lot of people rely on low-cost white-box 
> servers and decide that it's OK if a single PSU in a host dies, as, 
> well, we have HA to start on other hosts. If they have N+1 PSUs in the 
> hosts do they really have to migrate everything off? Swings and 
> roundabouts really.
>
> I'm also not sure I've seen any practical DC setups where a UPS can 
> monitor the load for every single attached physical machine and figure 
> out that one of the redundant PSUs in it has failed - I'd love to know 
> if there are as that would be really cool.
>
>     - If the machine is going down in an ordinary flow, surely it can
>     be done.
>
>
> Isn't that what "Maintenance mode" is for?
>
>     Â
>
>
>         Even if it was a network failure and the host was still up,
>         how would you live migrate a VM from a host you can't even
>         talk to?
>
>     It could be suspended to disk (local) - if the disk is available.
>
>     Then the decision if it is to be resumed from local disk or not
>     (as it might be HA'ed and is running elsewhere) need to be taken
>     later, of course.
>
>
> Yes, but that's not even remotely possible with Ovirt right now. I was 
> trying to be practical as the OP has only just started using Ovirt and 
> I think it might be a bit much to ask him to start coding up what he'd 
> like.
>
>     Â
>
>
>         The only way you could do it was if you somehow magically knew
>         far enough in advance that the host was about to fail (!) and
>         that gave enough time to migrate the machines off. But how
>         would you ever know that "machine quux.bar.net
>         <http://quux.bar.net> is going to fail in 7 minutes"?
>
>     I completely agree there are situations in which you can't foresee
>     the failure.Â
>
>     But in many, you can. In those cases, it makes sense for the host
>     to self-initiate 'move to maintenance' mode. The policy of what to
>     do when 'self-moving-to-maintenance-mode' could be pre-fetched
>     from the engine.
>
>     Y.
>
>
> Hmm, I would love that to be true. But I've seen so many so called 
> "corner-cases" that I now think the failure area in a datacenter is a 
> fractal with infinite corners. Yes, you could monitor SMART on local 
> drives, pick up uncorrected ECC errors, use "sensors" to check for 
> sagging voltages or high temps, but I don't think you can ever hope to 
> catch everything, and you could end up doing a migration "storm" for . 
> I've had more than enough of "Enterprise Spec" switches suddenly going 
> nuts and spamming corrupt MACs all over the LAN to know you can't ever 
> account for everything.
>
> I think it's better to adopt the model of redundancy in software and 
> services, so no-one even notices if a VM host goes away, there's 
> always something else to take up the slack. Just like the origins of 
> the Internet - the network should be dumb and the applications should 
> cope with it! Any infrastructure that can't cope with the loss of a 
> few VMs for a few minutes probably needs a refresh.
>
> Cheers
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


 .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150918/e3718c7a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list