[ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

[Dewey Du]

I prefer deploying as a hyperconverged setup, but it is still under experiment,
right?

So I try to separate vm service and storage. I added new storage domain(
Domain Type "Data", Storage Type "GlusterFS", Use Host "host-01". But then I
can't add another new storage domain( Domain Type "Data", Storage Type
"GlusterFS", Use Host "host-02"). The input field "path" is unwritable
(gray) on the Popup New Domain Window.

My question is, should we add a new storage domain for each ovirt-node?



On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:

> Make sure that you use replica 3 gluster volumes for storing VM images.
> Are you planning to deploy as a hyperconverged setup?
> Either way, try and use the latest ovirt 3.6 and glusterfs 3.7 (3.7.12
> that addresses bugs related to sharding and o-direct is due to be released
> soon)
>
> On 06/21/2016 07:08 AM, Dewey Du wrote:
>
> I want to deploy oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 to my online servers. Is it
> recommended for production usage?
>
> Thx.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160624/ac1d9142/attachment-0001.html>