[ovirt-users] 3.6 looses network on reboot

David LeVene David.LeVene at blackboard.com
Tue Mar 1 23:36:59 UTC 2016


Hi Dan,

I missed the email as the subject line changed!

So we use and run IPv6 in our network - not sure if this is related. The Addresses are handed out via SLAAC so that would be where the IPv6 address is coming from.

My memory is a bit sketchy... but I think if I remove the vmfex/SRIOV vNIC and only run with the one vNIC it works fine, it's when I bring the second NIC into play with SRIOV the issues arise.

Answers inline.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Kenigsberg [mailto:danken at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 00:28
To: David LeVene <David.LeVene at blackboard.com>
Cc: edwardh at redhat.com; users at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] 3.6 looses network on reboot

This sounds very bad. Changing the subject, so the wider, more problematic issue is visible.

Did any other user see this behavior?

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:27:46AM +0000, David LeVene wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Answers as follows;
>
> # rpm -qa | grep -i vdsm
> vdsm-jsonrpc-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-hook-vmfex-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-infra-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-python-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-cli-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-xmlrpc-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
> vdsm-hook-vmfex-dev-4.17.18-1.el7.noarch
>
>
> There was in this folder ifcfg-ovirtmgnt bridge setup, and also route-ovirtmgnt & rule-ovirtmgmt.. but they were removed after the reboot.
>
> # ls -althr | grep ifcfg
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root  254 Sep 16 21:21 ifcfg-lo -rw-r--r--. 1 root
> root  120 Feb 25 14:07 ifcfg-enp7s0f0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 root root  174 Feb
> 25 14:40 ifcfg-enp6s0
>
> I think I modified ifcfg-enp6s0 to get networking up again (eg was set to bridge.. but the bridge wasn't configured).. it was a few days ago.. if it's important I can reboot the box again to see what state it comes up with.
>
> # cat ifcfg-enp6s0
> BOOTPROTO="none"
> IPADDR="10.80.10.117"
> NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
> GATEWAY="10.80.10.1"
> DEVICE="enp6s0"
> HWADDR="00:25:b5:00:0b:4f"
> ONBOOT=yes
> PEERDNS=yes
> PEERROUTES=yes
> MTU=1500
>
> # cat ifcfg-enp7s0f0
> # Generated by VDSM version 4.17.18-1.el7
> DEVICE=enp7s0f0
> ONBOOT=yes
> MTU=1500
> HWADDR=00:25:b5:00:0b:0f
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> # find /var/lib/vdsm/persistence
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf.1456371473833165545
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf.1456371473833165545/nets
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf.1456371473833165545/nets/ovirtmgmt
>
> # cat
> /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf.1456371473833165545/nets/ovirtmgmt
> {
>     "nic": "enp6s0",
>     "ipaddr": "10.80.10.117",
>     "mtu": "1500",
>     "netmask": "255.255.255.0",
>     "STP": "no",
>     "bridged": "true",
>     "gateway": "10.80.10.1",
>     "defaultRoute": true
> }
>
> Supervdsm log is attached.

Have you editted ifcfg-ovirtmgmt manually?
Nope

Can you somehow reproduce it, and share its content?
Yea, I should be able to reproduce it - just gotta fix it first (create the networking manually and get VDSM on-line).  Also it’s a side project/investigation at the moment so time isn't on my side...

Would it help if I take an sosreport before and after? I don’t' mine emailing these directly to yourself.

Do you have NetworkManager running? which version?
NM is disabled, but the version is...
# rpm -q NetworkManager
NetworkManager-1.0.6-27.el7.x86_64
# systemctl status NetworkManager.service
● NetworkManager.service - Network Manager
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)

It seems that Vdsm has two bugs: on boot, initscripts end up setting an
ipv6 address that Vdsm never requested

As mentioned above this would have come from SLAAC which we have setup in our network

    restore-net::INFO::2016-02-25 14:14:58,024::vdsm-restore-net-config::261::root::(_find_changed_or_missing) ovirtmgmt is different or missing from persistent configuration. current: {'nic': 'enp6s0', 'dhcpv6': False, 'ipaddr': '10.80.10.117', 'mtu': '1500', 'netmask': '255.255.255.0', 'bootproto': 'none', 'stp': False, 'bridged': True, 'ipv6addr': ['2400:7d00:110:3:225:b5ff:fe00:b4f/64'], 'gateway': '10.80.10.1', 'defaultRoute': True}, persisted: {u'nic': u'enp6s0', 'dhcpv6': False, u'ipaddr': u'10.80.10.117', u'mtu': '1500', u'netmask': u'255.255.255.0', 'bootproto': 'none', 'stp': False, u'bridged': True, u'gateway': u'10.80.10.1', u'defaultRoute': True}


Then, Vdsm tries to drop the
unsolicited address, but fails. Both must be fixed ASAP.

    restore-net::ERROR::2016-02-25 14:14:59,490::__init__::58::root::(__exit__) Failed rollback transaction last known good network.
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 918, in setupNetworks
        keep_bridge=keep_bridge)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 222, in wrapped
        ret = func(**attrs)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 502, in _delNetwork
        configurator.removeQoS(net_ent)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/configurators/__init__.py", line 122, in removeQoS
        qos.remove_outbound(top_device)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/configurators/qos.py", line 60, in remove_outbound
        device, pref=_NON_VLANNED_ID if vlan_tag is None else vlan_tag)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/tc/filter.py", line 31, in delete
        _wrapper.process_request(command)
      File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/tc/_wrapper.py", line 38, in process_request
        raise TrafficControlException(retcode, err, command)
    TrafficControlException: (None, 'Message truncated', ['/usr/sbin/tc', 'filter', 'del', 'dev', 'enp6s0', 'pref', '5000'])

Regards,
Dan.
This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of Blackboard that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, re-distribution or other use of any of this information is strictly prohibited. Please immediately notify the sender and delete this transmission if you received this email in error.



More information about the Users mailing list