[ovirt-users] Hardware setup
stirabos at redhat.com
Fri Sep 9 16:29:06 UTC 2016
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel at altn.com> wrote:
> Yes that is the document i have been looking at, unfortunately i am still
> pretty new to the ovirt/gluster world. But both seem like the would be a
> great fit for our goals.
Indeed it will be a great solution for specific scenarios.
If you can afford to wait for a few months a robust hyperonvergence
integration, you can start playing with it knowing that today it's still
not production ready.
Any feedback on that solution will be really appreciated.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos at redhat.com>
> To: Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel at altn.com>
> Cc: users <users at ovirt.org>
> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:12:29 +0200
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hardware setup
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel at altn.com>
>> I am looking to put together a configuration setup for a new install and
>> was wondering if it is ok for have both gluster and ovirt running on the
>> same systems, or if it was better to separate my storage on to anther
>> I am currently looking into 3 servers with 196 GB Ram, dual 6 core proc's
>> on each server. Gluster would be installed on each server with a 3 way
>> replica, ovirt would be running as an appliance and each node would be part
>> of the ovirt cluster.
> That approach is called hyper-converged.
> With 4.0 is still somehow bleeding edge and not recommended for a
> production env; a stable solution will come quite early.
> If you want start playing with it you can take a look at this article
> which exactly covers what you want to do:
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users