[ovirt-users] Network configuration validation error

Michael Burman mburman at redhat.com
Thu Feb 8 10:17:03 UTC 2018


Thanks,
I'm not so familiar with the hosted-engine --upgrade-appliance flow, can
someone from the list that is familiar with such flow assist?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:10 PM, <spfma.tech at e.mail.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I installed my nodes with the latest packages available in repositories.
> Then I installed the self-hosted engine on one of them, created the cluster
> and added the second node.
>
> When I encountered these network config problems and saw your answer, I
> thougt it was time to update some packages to get corrections.
>
> So I just runned a "yum update" on the nodes and rebooted them.
>
> Then I put the  engine in global maintenance mode and tried "hosted-engine
> --upgrade-appliance" on the node hosting it.
>
> But it failed returning me this cluster version error.
>
> The engine's about windows says "Software Version:4.2.0.2-1.el7.centos"
>
> And for the hosts :
> OS Version:RHEL - 7 - 4.1708.el7.centos
> OS Description:CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
> Kernel Version:3.10.0 - 693.17.1.el7.x86_64
> KVM Version:2.9.0 - 16.el7_4.13.1
> LIBVIRT Version:libvirt-3.2.0-14.el7_4.7
> VDSM Version:vdsm-4.20.9.3-1.el7.centos
> SPICE Version:0.12.8 - 2.el7.1
> GlusterFS Version:[N/A]
> CEPH Version:librbd1-0.94.5-2.el7
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
> Le 08-Feb-2018 09:59:32 +0100, mburman at redhat.com a écrit:
>
> Not sure i understand from which version you trying to upgrade and what is
> the exact upgrade flow, if i got it correctly, it is seems that you
> upgraded the hosts to 4.2, but engine still 4.1?
> What exactly the upgrade steps, please explain the flow., what have you
> done after upgrading the hosts? to what version?
>
> Cheers)
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:00 PM, <spfma.tech at e.mail.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>>
>> I applied some updates at node level, but I forgot to upgrade the engine !
>>
>> When I try to do so I get a strange error : "Cluster PROD is at version
>> 4.2 which is not supported by this upgrade flow. Please fix it before
>> upgrading."
>>
>> Here are the installed packets on my nodes :
>> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.2.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64
>> ovirt-imageio-common-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.2.3-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.9.1-1.el7.noarch
>> ovirt-setup-lib-1.1.4-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-release42-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-imageio-daemon-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-host-dependencies-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
>> ovirt-host-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
>> ovirt-host-deploy-1.7.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-provider-ovn-driver-1.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20171219.1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-vmconsole-host-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch
>> cockpit-ovirt-dashboard-0.11.3-0.1.el7.centos.noarch
>> ovirt-vmconsole-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch
>>
>> What I am supposed to do ? I see no newer packages available.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 07-Feb-2018 13:23:43 +0100, mburman at redhat.com a écrit:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This is a bug and it was already fixed in 4.2.1.1-0.1.el7 -
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528906
>>
>> The no default route bug was fixed in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
>> show_bug.cgi?id=1477589
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:15 PM, <spfma.tech at e.mail.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I am experiencing a new problem : when I try to modify something in the
>>> network setup on the second node (added to the cluster after installing the
>>> engine on the other one) using the Engine GUI, I get the following error
>>> when validating :
>>>
>>>     must match "^\b((25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\
>>> d|\d?\d)\_){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)"
>>>     Attribut : ipConfiguration.iPv4Addresses[0].gateway
>>>
>>> Moreover, on the general status of ther server, I have a "Host has no
>>> default route" alert.
>>>
>>> The ovirtmgmt network has a defined gateway of course, and the storage
>>> network has none because it is not required. Both server have the same
>>> setup, with different addresses of course :-)
>>>
>>> I have not been able to find anything useful in the logs.
>>>
>>> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> FreeMail powered by mail.fr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michael Burman
>>
>> Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> mburman at redhat.com    M: 0545355725     IM: mburman
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> FreeMail powered by mail.fr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Burman
>
> Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> mburman at redhat.com    M: 0545355725     IM: mburman
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> FreeMail powered by mail.fr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>


-- 

Michael Burman

Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com>

mburman at redhat.com    M: 0545355725     IM: mburman
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180208/c3376be6/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list