[ovirt-users] Network configuration validation error

spfma.tech at e.mail.fr spfma.tech at e.mail.fr
Thu Feb 8 10:19:33 UTC 2018


In fact I don't know what flow should be followed. I have found several documentations, but most deal with older version so I am not sure I am doing right.
 Is there a working documented procedure somewhere ? 

 Le 08-Feb-2018 11:17:06 +0100, mburman at redhat.com a crit: 
  Thanks, I'm not so familiar with the hosted-engine --upgrade-appliance flow, can someone from the list that is familiar with such flow assist?  
 On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:10 PM,  wrote:

 Hi,   I installed my nodes with the latest packages available in repositories. Then I installed the self-hosted engine on one of them, created the cluster and added the second node.   When I encountered these network config problems and saw your answer, I thougt it was time to update some packages to get corrections.   So I just runned a "yum update" on the nodes and rebooted them.   Then I put the engine in global maintenance mode and tried "hosted-engine --upgrade-appliance" on the node hosting it.   But it failed returning me this cluster version error.   The engine's about windows says "Software Version:4.2.0.2-1.el7.centos"   And for the hosts :        OS Version:RHEL - 7 - 4.1708.el7.centos         OS Description:CentOS Linux 7 (Core)         Kernel Version:3.10.0 - 693.17.1.el7.x86_64         KVM Version:2.9.0 - 16.el7_4.13.1         LIBVIRT Version:libvirt-3.2.0-14.el7_4.7         VDSM Version:vdsm-4.20.9.3-1.el7.centos         SPICE Version:0.12.8 - 2.el7.1         GlusterFS Version:[N/A]         CEPH Version:librbd1-0.94.5-2.el7          Regards     

 Le 08-Feb-2018 09:59:32 +0100, mburman at redhat.com a crit: 
   Not sure i understand from which version you trying to upgrade and what is the exact upgrade flow, if i got it correctly, it is seems that you upgraded the hosts to 4.2, but engine still 4.1? What exactly the upgrade steps, please explain the flow., what have you done after upgrading the hosts? to what version?

 Cheers) 
 On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:00 PM,  wrote:

 Hi, Thanks a lot for your answer.    I applied some updates at node level, but I forgot to upgrade the engine !   When I try to do so I get a strange error : "Cluster PROD is at version 4.2 which is not supported by this upgrade flow. Please fix it before upgrading."   Here are the installed packets on my nodes : python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.2.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-imageio-common-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.2.3-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.9.1-1.el7.noarch
ovirt-setup-lib-1.1.4-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-release42-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-imageio-daemon-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-host-dependencies-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-host-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-host-deploy-1.7.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-provider-ovn-driver-1.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20171219.1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-vmconsole-host-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch
cockpit-ovirt-dashboard-0.11.3-0.1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-vmconsole-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch   What I am supposed to do ? I see no newer packages available.   Regards   

 Le 07-Feb-2018 13:23:43 +0100, mburman at redhat.com a crit: 
    Hi

 This is a bug and it was already fixed in 4.2.1.1-0.1.el7 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528906

 The no default route bug was fixed in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477589

 Thanks, 
 On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:15 PM,  wrote:

   Hi, I am experiencing a new problem : when I try to modify something in the network setup on the second node (added to the cluster after installing the engine on the other one) using the Engine GUI, I get the following error when validating :    must match "^\b((25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)\_){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)"
 Attribut : ipConfiguration.iPv4Addresses[0].gateway   Moreover, on the general status of ther server, I have a "Host has no default route" alert.   The ovirtmgmt network has a defined gateway of course, and the storage network has none because it is not required. Both server have the same setup, with different addresses of course :-)   I have not been able to find anything useful in the logs.   Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong ?   Regards 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.fr 
_______________________________________________
 Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

Michael Burman 

Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel 

Red Hat 

 mburman at redhat.com  M: 0545355725 IM: mburman 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.fr  
_______________________________________________
 Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

Michael Burman 

Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel 

Red Hat 

 mburman at redhat.com  M: 0545355725 IM: mburman 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.fr  
_______________________________________________
 Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

Michael Burman 

Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel 

Red Hat 

 mburman at redhat.com  M: 0545355725 IM: mburman 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180208/98e25adc/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list