feature suggestion: migration network

[Livnat Peer]

On 01/21/2013 08:21 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> Livnat Peer wrote:
> 
> 
>> I think you are describing a use case for separating the migration network from the management network.
>> I see a reason for providing that, for example the use case you described above.
>> I am curious if there is a use case to have more than one migration network in a Cluser.
> 
> Given that tenants do not explicitly request that their VMs be migrated I can't see charging for them.
> If there is no separate chargeback I do not see any benefit from having multiple migration networks.
> The management plane is already capable of favoring Platinum customers over Bronze customers
> without real-time support from the network.
> 
> On the other hand there is clear value in preventing migration traffic from interfering with management
> traffic, for example cancelling a migration.
> 
>

Thanks for your input Caitlin, I think that's a solid argument for
avoiding the complexity of supporting multiple migration networks per
cluster.