Re: [VOTE] Inclusion of memory overcommit manager
-0.9
I don't think we should rush into adding projects. I think there's an open
question of whether MOM should be folded into VDSM or whether it should be stand
alone.
I'd like to see a roadmap for either integrating into VDSM or a clear (agreed
upon) description of what components own what functionality.
My concern is that having MOM be an oVirt project would discourage attempts to
merge MOM into VDSM.
N.B. my vote is non-binding.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 09/27/2011 12:41 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
This vote is to accept into oVirt the memory overcommit manager (mom)
project either to be used as a dependency in VDSM or as a daemon
alongside VDSM. This detail will be worked during integration.
If the project is accepted and given it is our first community submitted
project to be voted we will create an infrastructure setup list which I
will record. This can then be used to make it easier for the next
project joining.
Please vote -1, 0, +1 whether you would like to include this project
into oVirt. I'll leave the vote open at least 72 hours.
regards
Carl.
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board