Re: suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
======================================================
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development,
both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and
evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when
reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network
configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py
11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
8 vdsm/API.py
8 tests/configNetworkTests.py
7 vdsm/netinfo.py
7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
4 vdsm/netmodels.py
... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py
12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
7 vdsm/clientIF.py
6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
5 vdsm/caps.py
5 vdsm/API.py
4 vdsm/vm.py
4 vdsm/netmodels.py
4 vdsm/Makefile.am
I suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding
that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is
particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe
it's due to the summer season.
To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch
(+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it
if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say,
one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
Dan.