On 01/17/2012 05:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/17/2012 09:02 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 12:50 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>> On 01/12/2012 05:43 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Am 12.01.2012 um 23:32 schrieb Anthony Liguori<aliguori(a)us.ibm.com>:
>>>>> On 01/12/2012 03:53 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>>>>> oVirt - the virtual datacenter management platform
>>>>>>> Provision, manage and monitor hypervisors and virtual
>>>>> Perhaps the tag line should be more KVM centric?
>>>>> Provision, manage and monitor virtual machines in the KVM
>>> Provision, manage and monitor KVM? Whoever comes to oVirt will
>>> hopefully know which kvm we're talking about :)
>> I wonder if we should spell it out also, if only to get better keyword
>> mapping with google.
> One additional though is that we primarily focus on KVM, however if some
> summits patches for linux container (as an example) support and they
> 'fit' in well, we would most likely take them.
I'm not in favor of non kvm activities too. At least for this year.
oVirt needs the focus. In theory it can do it all - kvm, xen,
containers, cloud, etc. But in practice it would be the best for us to
focus of being as good as we can in a more narrow, realistic field. The
current field is enterprise virtualization using kvm. IMHO that's the
right one and there is plenty of work to do around it. Spreading around
will slow down the main effort (even if others do the work).
Potentially in a year time we may re-evaluate things.
Er, would we? That seems to go pretty much against what I understood as
the purpose of oVirt.
> Maybe virt in the
> tagline, and then KVM in the blurb text below on the main page?
> Board mailing list
Board mailing list