suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers ====================================================== During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project. They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches. Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting 27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py ... similar to Mark's 80: 16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.am I suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation. What do you say? Dan.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe it's due to the summer season. To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid). Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say, one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights? Dan.
participants (2)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Michal Skrivanek