Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug

Well Related-To means exactly what you are proposing where I came from (the platform group, distgit, errata..) :) But whatever suits you. Martin -- Martin Sivák msivak(a)redhat.com Red Hat Czech RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ ----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com&gt; > > To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com&gt;, devel(a)ovirt.org > > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:53:53 PM > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Stable branch gerrit hook and Related-To: bug > > > > > What if gerrit used the dependency info and would not -1 patches > > > that are dependency of a patch with a bug url? > > > > That is not a bad idea, but there is one use case you do not consider.. > > it > > would mean that feature cannot be merged before it is completed. > > > > I like my patches to be merged as soon as possible. Of course if the > > patches > > leave the tree in working state. > > Right > > > The patchset that started this thread already depends on about 15 > > patches > > that were merged to master two moths ago. > > So how about: > > Required-For: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1096197 > > You must merge this to get the bug fixed, but the bug status is not > changed when merged. > > The hook can add the patch to the bug as a tracker. > > David, can we easily add such tag?

> > NIr