Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 status - Go / No Go

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:42:34PM -0400, Nir Soffer wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: Users(a)ovirt.org, devel(a)ovirt.org >> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:46:15 PM >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 status - Go / No Go >> >> Il 29/09/2014 08:34, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto: >>> Hi, >>> We were supposed to start composing oVirt 3.5.0 GA today 2014-09-29 but we >>> still have 3 blockers. >>> >>> Maintainers: >>> - Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot satisfy release criteria[9] >>> - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release >>> - If any patch must block the GA release please raise the issue as soon as >>> possible. >>> - If any packages need a rebase please raise the issue as soon as possible. >>> - Be aware that packages that doesn't need a rebase must be re-built with >>> final release versioning from the RC3 tag. >>> - Please provide ETA for new blockers for rescheduling an RC4 and a GA >>> release. >>> >>> The bug tracker [1] shows 3 blockers: >>> Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary >>> 1147085 storage POST Memory volumes not deleted when removing a vm with >>> snapshots >>> 1146073 sla POST Failing to Attach a Storage Domain without Disk Profiles >>> to a Data Center 3.5 >>> 1127460 storage NEW VM abnormal stop after LV refreshing when using thin >>> provisioning on block storage >> >> Today we have: >> Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary >> 1127460 storage POST VM abnormal stop after LV refreshing when using thin >> provisioning on block storage > > Basically this is an issue with systemd, not with ovirt. However we have a workaround > that we can consume in the short term. > > Patch for RHEL7: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/33492 > > We believe that we can get the real fix for the underlying component for Fedora quickly. > If not, we have a patch ready for enabling the workaround on Fedora. > > Patch for Fedora: http://http://gerrit.ovirt.org/33555 > >> 1147971 storage NEW Snapshot locked after successful live storage migration > > This is an ifra issue, handled by Ravi. > >> ETA? > > Dan? We still have nasty selinux-related issues on el7, such as 1142454 sanlock not allowed to send SIGTERM or SIGKILL signals and surprizes with el6.6 beta 1148467 Fail to start VM: libvirtError: Child quit during startup handshake: Input/output error 1148432 vdsm fails to start if there is a virbr0 that's attached to an interface but I've tagged vdsm v4.16.6 for rc4. Sandro could you take a snapshot based on it? (We still have an issue building 3.5's vdsm on Fedora for ARM)