Hello Milan.
Yes. You can do that.
Thanks.
> On 7 Feb 2019, at 22:06, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:37 AM Anton Marchukov <amarchuk(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Milan.
>>>
>>> We do not necessary need it earlier, but we want to have some date in
>>> mind, so we can plan our CI work accordingly.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts for engine? Should it also target Feb 18?
>>>
>>
>> On Feb 19th we should release oVirt 4.3.1 RC (4.3.1 GA na Feb 26th along
>> with RHV 4.3 beta 2), so I'd say let's branch after the final 4.3.1
build
>> ...
>
> I believe we needn't branch out Vdsm and Engine on the same date, right?
> So we can branch out Vdsm earlier than Engine, around Feb 18-19, is it
> OK?
>
>>> Anton.
>>>
>>>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:41, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anton Marchukov <amarchuk(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Since oVirt 4.3.0 released are we ready to branch master into 4.3?
>>>>
>>>> Regarding Vdsm, there is still an ongoing storage work for 4.3 and no
>>>> really strong pressure for branching out 4.3 I'm aware of. For that
>>>> reason, Vdsm developers have agreed that we could create Vdsm ovirt-4.3
>>>> branch on February 18 (and no significantly later than that). If the
>>>> branch is needed earlier for infra or other reasons, we can make it.
>>>> Storage work would have to be backported, but that can be mostly trivial
>>>> if an initial master-merge rush is avoided.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Milan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anton Marchukov
>>> Team Lead - Release Management - RHV DevOps - Red Hat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>