On 11/21/2012 10:53 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moti Asayag" <masayag(a)redhat.com>
> To: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:36:58 PM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] Report vNic Implementation Details
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a proposal for reporting the vNic implementation details as
> reported by the guest agent per each vNic.
>
> Please review the wiki and add your comments.
While we're making the change is there anything else we'd want to report - MTU,
MAC (since a user might try to override), etc ?
>
>
http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/ReportingVnicImplementation
iirc, the fact ip addresses appear under guest info in the api and not
under the vnic was a modeling decision.
for example, what if guest is using a bridge, or a bond (yes, sounds
unlikely, but the point is it may be incorrect to assume ip-vnic relation.
michael - do you remember the details of that discussion?