On 01/12/2012 03:50 PM, Jon Choate wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim"<iheim(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Jon Choate"<jchoate(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:44:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] the future of template cloning
>
> On 01/12/2012 02:19 PM, Jon Choate wrote:
>> We are going to be able to store the disks for a template on
>> different storage domains due to the multiple storage domain
>> feature. Cloning a template will still be possible, but will it
>> provide any value? Thoughts?
>
> you would want to clone the disks to the storage domains you would
> want
> to create thinly provisioned disks from for this template.
>
> so a template could have disk1 and disk2 on SD1, then disk2 cloned to
> SD2 to allow creating a VM with thin COW for disk2 on SD2 as well.
>
But with the ability to create a template with disk 1 on SD1 and disk2 on SD2 is that
still a compelling feature?
yes, since I may want to create virtual machines from this template
where the 2nd disk is sometimes on SD1 and sometime on SD2 (just like
today, where i can instantiate a VM from the template on multiple
storage domains)
The new feature will just allow me to not clone all the disks of the
template to all storage domains, rather a subset.