--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 08/27, Martin Sivak wrote:
Hi,
=20
I would like to ask if it might be possible for the gerrit hook to stop g=
iving -1
to patches that do not have bug-url, but have related-to.
=20
The reason for this is that I have a rather large patchset that is adding=
a new
feature. No single patch by itself fixes the referenced bug and ther=
e are also patches that are not related to the feature itself, but were bac=
kported because they did some refactoring that was needed for the code to a=
pply and/or work properly.
I have a couple question, which of these should happen for the
Related-To bugs?
* Should it pass the same checks than a Bug-Url?
Most probably yes
Right now that is:
- Public
- Target release
- Product
* Should it change the bug statuses too?
Most probably no
* Should it update the external trackers of the bug?
Most probably yes
=20
--
Martin Siv=E1k
msivak(a)redhat.com
Red Hat Czech
RHEV-M SLA / Brno, CZ
=20
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--=20
David Caro
Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro(a)redhat.com
Web:
www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT/xRpAAoJEEBxx+HSYmnDYOwH/i1tjpLYgdbDxXMbrCubTxNt
TuIyH/C962vZ3478Ukqh30tarXTIc0wn+d0Qi3QNA4UfTgE0+UHSlUUn+VS8UTFd
+cfkNNLSLnRRwyESs6/CCF7+ExOBhvPKiKl1l7HVknp8Lt/4xtFbZY4HLDG61DJE
bWyXptI/4gOAFYuO48G07WcVAG/6uMVabq6ynx2xfij04G+lMw+52pS28cJNcxgP
HZvC/i63wjlGDQ3ZvchzNaWl+8bXS9bT74CwHgeHU+VKcysd4mfdgsPtl8il0uq2
i/o43GsAY6hPzAP1KMTjk0vgMQZZ02Sak+mELj8isgS3TE7HhEHbiKslUbHI+TU=
=8bpq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8--