----- Original Message -----
Hi Ayal,
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:19:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
>
>
> >
> > I still fail to understand why you 'punish' existing objects and
> > not
> > giving them the new feature enabled by default.
>
> This is not a feature, it's a bug!
Whatever we call it, it is a change in behavior. We agreed that it
will be enabled for all existing objects by default.
http://globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/bug_vs_featur...
> This should not be treated as a feature and this should not be
> configurable!
I can imagine some situations when I would not like the autorecovery
to happen, but if everyone agrees not to make it configurable, I
will just remove it from my patchset.
It's not autorecovery, you're not recovering anything. You're reflecting the
fact that the resource is back to normal (not due to anything that the engine did).
This is why it is a bug today.
This is why it should not be configurable.
> Today an object moves to non-operational due to state reported by
> vdsm. The object should immediately return to up the moment vdsm
> reports the object as ok (this means that you don't stop monitoring
> just because there is an error).
> That's it. no db field and no nothing...
> This pertains to storage domains, network, host status, whatever.
>
> > Y.
> >
> > > b. In environment to be clean installed -we have 0 existing
> > > entities -
> > > after clean install all new entities in the system will be
> > > create
> > > with
> > > auto recoverable set to true.
> > > Will this be considered a bad behavior?
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Engine-devel mailing list
> > > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> > >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Engine-devel mailing list
> > Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>