On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi,
according to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=
flag%3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%
20status%3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers.
We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=
flag%3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%
20status%3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
1525907 <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage vdsm
General danken(a)redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a restart in
fresh install... <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907>
urgent urgent ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12
Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can
postpone to 4.2.1.
I don't think it is for me to review.
The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim
that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to
reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this
is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?
Yaniv Bronheim, if we don't need to block on this, please tag VDSM for
release.