On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
> The fact that this is specified in the 'jenkins' repo **does not place
> this outside the maintainers` responsibility**.
A repo where I do not have commit rights means I can't take full
responsibility.
About this, nothing prevent to give merge rights to project maintainers I
think.
A repo that is not atomically synchronized with my sources means I
can't take full responsibility.
I think bkorren is working toward this.
> We actually have an initiative to move this information to the project
> repos. I've started with asking on devel list about how to specify
> this as part of Standard-CI [1]. But have received little topical
> response so far.
> [1]:
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2017-January/029161.html
You've got enough responses already to propose a different schema than
fixed branch names. Just give us a config file. Seriously, stop
reinventing the wheel and take a look at how others are doing it
(distgit, travis, tito, ...).
Martin
>
> --
> Barak Korren
> bkorren(a)redhat.com
> RHCE, RHCi, RHV-DevOps Team
>
https://ifireball.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at
redhat.com