Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt CI now supports Fedora 27 and Fedora Rawhide

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:36 AM Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> > >> Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more > >> importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures. > > > > > > I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak > slave > > utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older > Fedora > > versions. > > > > I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide > testing is > > useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time... > > > >> Nir, with your experience - does it worth it? > >> > >> How about having "rawhide" as non-voting? > > > > > > You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' > script > > that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process > > return value. > > This would eliminate the only benefit I see in having rawhide at all: > I'd like to see the rawhide job in RED if it is currently broken, so I > can look deeper to see why. If it's always green, it's useless to me. > However, if it is often red due to temporary unrelated changes, I > would not like it to block fixes. > > But as you say, we can try it out and check the signal/noise ratio. > I sent patches for ovirt-imageio, we need similar patches for vdsm. https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84309/ https://gerrit.ovirt.org/84308/ Piotr, can you handle this for vdsm? Nir