Re: [ovirt-devel] Reported-By - giving credit to our testers
Hi,
I think it's nice to have some appreciation for helping (Beside a working Environment
*g*),
I don't have a problem with doing it automatically as my name also appears in the
mailing lists and bugzilla.
Till next time
Christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Yedidyah Bar David [mailto:didi@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. November 2015 11:12
An: Ondřej Svoboda <ondrej(a)svobodasoft.cz>
Cc: devel <devel(a)ovirt.org>; Grundmann, Christian
<Christian.Grundmann(a)fabasoft.com>
Betreff: Re: [ovirt-devel] Reported-By - giving credit to our testers
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Ondřej Svoboda <ondrej(a)svobodasoft.cz> wrote:
On 13.11.2015 07:55, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Our QE (and sometimes our users) are working hard testing and
> reporting bugs, but their effort is never mentioned in our code.
>
> Looking at kernel git history, I found that they are using the
> Reported-By header for giving credit to the person reporting a bug. I
> suggest we adapt this header.
>
> Here are some examples how we can use it:
>
> - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/48483/3//COMMIT_MSG
> -
> https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/commit/fb4c72af5e4c200409c74834111d44d9
> 2959ebbd
> -
> https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/commit/f8127d88add881a4775e7030dde24331
> 25c7b598
infra: looking at above commit messages, can we get automatically
added the following lines?
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/46540 on patch creation
Reviewed-by: Francesco Romani <fromani(a)redhat.com> on patch comment
+1 both to Nir's original idea and to Sandro's suggestions.
Now encountered [1] my first such case since this thread, and not sure
I agree to automatically add people. Some people might not want that
at all, some would prefer to have control over their name, some might
prefer an email address different from the one used for posting or no
email address at all.
I usually ask people to open a bug or comment on an existing bug.
Isn't that enough? Are git logs so much more important than bugzilla
history?
Another option I can think of is:
Report-Url: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-November/035947.html
Adding Christian, the reporter of [1]. Christian, feel free to ignore
current thread, and/or voice up your opinion, and/or say if you want
to appear as "Reported-By:" in the git commit message [2]. Thanks :-)
[1] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-November/035947.html
[2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/48596
Best,
--
Didi