10:58 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
To: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 6:57:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:41:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>
> On 01/29/2013 04:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
> >> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:44:33 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >>
> >> On 01/21/2013 09:45 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> >>> On 01/21/2013 10:28 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> >>>>> To: "Michael Pasternak" <mpastern(a)redhat.com>
> >>>>> Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>,
> >>>>> engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> >>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 8:27:36 AM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> From: "Michael Pasternak"
<mpastern(a)redhat.com>
> >>>>>> To: "Juan Hernandez" <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24:58 PM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to
3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 01/17/2013 01:04 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
> >>>>>>> Once 3.2.0 is released I think we should move to
> >>>>>>> 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> the master branch:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>> I agree, and this is not the only place where should start
> >>>>> marking
> >>>>
> >>>> and cluster compatibility version..
> >>>
> >>> all above is true, but Juan meant preparing MVN infra for the
> >>> next
> >>> development iteration, while you're talking about engine
> >>> internals,
> >>> maybe we should file BZs on that (as next version tasks) or
> >>> should
> >>> we
> >>> define new process of preparing for the next version that will
> >>> include both?
> >>
> >> As I don't see hard opposition to this change I will merge it
> >> tomorrow.
> >> Please raise your hand iif you think it shouldn't be merged.
> >>
> >> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11143
> >
> > For the poms, why didn't you use a variable that is inherited?
> > But
> > Java is not my domain.
>
> Maven doesn't support use of variables in any of the coordinates of
> the
> artifacts or of their parents. If you use variables, specially if
> you
> use them in the "version" of the parent project and the variable is
> inherited from the parent project, there is no way to determine
> which
> version of the parent project should be used.
That's correct, but you can set the version numbers of the ovirt
artifacts to ${parent.version}. But let's do it in a next patch, we
already spent enough time on this :) Merge!
It this is correct, there is no point in merge and fix.
Fix and merge.
>
> >
> > Tarball should be ovirt-engine-3.3.0_master.tar.gz
> > RPM release should be ovirt-engine-3.3.0-0.0.master
> >
> > This will enable us to release milestones, such as beta1, beta2,
> > rc1, rc2 and finally release without suffix.
> >
>
> --
> Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3,
> planta
> 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
> Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red
> Hat
> S.L.
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>