[ovirt-devel] Re: Alpha 4.5 Test Day | Deploy on Ceph Storage

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 2:00 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > Il giorno gio 17 mar 2022 alle ore 13:40 Benny Zlotnik < > bzlotnik(a)redhat.com&gt; ha scritto: > >> I did some more research, execute_values() is actually from psycopg2 >> (a dependency of sqlalchemy), the docs[1] mention fetch is available >> since 2.8 >> The version on my system is: >> $ rpm -q python3-psycopg2 >> python3-psycopg2-2.8.6-1.rhel8.x86_64 >> >> > latest version in appstream is 2.7.5-7.el8 > +Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com&gt; Perhaps yoga is missing > an updated python3-psycopg2 to match python3-sqlalchemy-1.4.31-1.el8.x86_64 > and python3-cinderlib-4.1.0-1 on el8s? > I see it built for el9s but not for el8s: > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=34610 > > Actually, we only have python-psycopg2 as Build Requirement in CS9 as we don´t support postgresql as database for openstack. We don't ship it in the repos. I see one for cs8 by infra team https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=32014 that you probably could crosstag?

Alfredo > [1] >> https://www.psycopg.org/docs/extras.html#psycopg2.extras.execute_values >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 2:13 PM Jöran Malek <joeran3(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > >> > Enabled the module hotfixes for yoga-testing, successfully updated to >> > # rpm -q python3-sqlalchemy >> > python3-sqlalchemy-1.4.31-1.el8.x86_64 >> > Issue is still the same: >> > 2022-03-17 13:11:06,310 - cinderlib-client - ERROR - Failure occurred >> when trying to run command 'storage_stats': execute_values() got an >> unexpected keyword argument 'fetch' [2725c57d-de29-44b6-b765-523825fd66cb] >> > >> > Verified after restarting the engine and leaving global maintenance >> mode. >> >> > > -- > > Sandro Bonazzola > > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > > sbonazzo(a)redhat.com > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > *Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to > answer this email out of your office hours.* > > >