----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:22:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about Engine user session timeout
On 10/22/2013 10:12 AM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> However, as we have two distinct values for Engine session timeout, I guess
> my best shot is to do
> "min(UserSessionTimeOutInterval,UserSessionTimeOutInvalidationInterval)"
> and expose both via admin-only GetConfigurationValue query, but I'm not
> sure this is the best approach..
shouldn't that be sum() rather than min?
IIUC, the first config value (UserSessionTimeOutInterval) represents the delay between
Engine startup and first "cleanExpiredUsersSessions" job execution. The second
config value (UserSessionTimeOutInvalidationInterval) is the delay between subsequent
executions of this job. This is why I thought it should be min() out of these two; user
could open WebAdmin right after Engine startup or anytime after that.
Both config values have validValues=-1,1..100000 so -1 could disable first
(UserSessionTimeOutInterval) or subsequent (UserSessionTimeOutInvalidationInterval) job
execution. I'm still confused why we have two values, though..