9:20 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > >
> > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
> > > >> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
> > > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > >>
> > > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> > > >>>> To: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
> > > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
> > > >>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim
wrote:
> > > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
> > > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not
touched over 60 days
> > > >>>>>> (to
> > > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be
lower).
> > > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested
party post their
> > > >>>>>> closure.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should
actually get
> > > >>>>>> attention,
> > > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a
"lot of old patches"
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> thoughts?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Itamar
> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
> > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > >>>>>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that
checks the age
> > > >>>>> of
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers
and the
> > > >>>>> maintainer,
> > > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period
just abandons
> > > >>>>> it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all
subscribed
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or
something
> > > >>>> like
> > > >>>> that.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This will be annoying.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
> > > >>
> > > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no
> > > >> rebase,
> > > >> nothing)?
> > > >
> > > >
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:maste...
> > >
> > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment
> > > from any reviewer.
> > > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let
> > > them get old and stay forever
> >
> > Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
> > Owner can close these if he likes.
>
> right, but why?
> a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into
> motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc).
> I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
>
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its
contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying.
Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur
those interactions into motion.
> >
> > The problem is that maintainers avoid closing.
> > And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and
> > gone.
> >
> > So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
> >
> > 1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
> > cycle
> > (can be even a week).
> > 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor
progress.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Alon
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vdsm-devel mailing list
> > vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> >
>