On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:27 PM Adam Litke <alitke(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I also agree with the proposal. It's sad to turn in my keys but I'm
> likely unable to perform many duties expected of a maintainer at this
> point. I know that people can still find me via the git history :)
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:37 AM Milan Zamazal <mzamazal(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:33 PM Francesco Romani <fromani(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 11/27/19 3:25 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I want to remove inactive contributors from
vdsm-master-maintainers.
>> >> >
>> >> > I suggest the simple rule of 2 years of inactivity for removing
from
>> >> > this group,
>> >> > based on git log.
>> >> >
>> >> > See the list below for current status:
>> >> >
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/groups/106,members
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> No objections, keeping the list minimal and current is a good idea.
>> >
>> >
>> > I love removing dead code; I feel a bit different about removing old
>> > colleagues. Maybe I'm just being nostalgic.
>> >
>> > If we introduce this policy (which I understand is healthy), let us
>> > give a long warning period (6 months?) before we apply the policy to
>> > existing dormant maintainers. We should also make sure that we
>> > actively try to contact a person before he or she is dropped.
>>
>> I think this is a reasonable proposal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Milan
>>
>
I forgot about this, and another year passed.
Sending again, this time I added all past maintainers that may not watch
this list.
Very sad, but it makes total sense. +1
Note that other projects move past maintainers to a special group named
"emeritus_*".