2017-12-18 8:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com>:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
<sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> according to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag%
> 3Ablocker%2B%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%
> 3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
> we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers.
>
> We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag%
> 3Ablocker%3F%20target_milestone%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%
> 3Anew%2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
>
> 1525907 <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> Storage
> vdsm General danken(a)redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a
> restart in fresh install...
> <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525907> urgent urgent
> ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12
>
> Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can
> postpone to 4.2.1.
>
I don't think it is for me to review.
The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim
that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to
reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this
is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?
Adam, Nir, Tal, Allon, can you please review?
Yaniv Bronheim, if we don't need to block on this, please tag VDSM for
> release.
>
>
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>