Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Is there a preferred workflow when adding additional error messages to VDSM _and_ Engine?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I'm currently working on a patch to correct the logic used by vdsm when reviewing the logical and physical block size of physical volumes [1]. Once/If this is approved I'd like to look into making the exceptions thrown from vdsm and the errors displayed within engine more descriptive. Before I start throwing patches into gerrit I was wondering *if* there is a preferred workflow when adding additional exceptions and error messages across both projects. For example, committing changes to vdsm before engine, engine before vdsm or both at the same time. I'm also wondering if there is a way to say that vdsm gerrit changeid x relies on engine gerrit changeid y etc?

Thanks in advance, Lee - -- Lee Yarwood Software Maintenance Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd 200 Fowler Avenue IQ Farnborough, Farnborough, Hants GU14 7JP Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt Parson(USA), Charlie Peters (USA) GPG fingerprint : A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64 6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76 _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel