From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to
>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower).
>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their
closure.
>>>>
>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention,
>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old
patches"
>>>>
>>>> thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Itamar
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>>>
>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the
>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer,
>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
>>>
>>
>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to
>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
>
> This will be annoying.
>
> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase,
nothing)?
>
> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
>
> Alon
>