Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] New versioning scheme
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> 1. master
>
> vdsm-4.19.0-201606011345.gitxxxyyy
Ack and +1 to the idea, but I have one small comment. Isn't it usual
in Fedora (for example) to use the following?
vdsm-4.19.0-0.201606011345.gitxxxyyy
Please note the zero in the release part (-0.something). The stable is
then released as vdsm-4.19.0-1 keeping the version intact.
Thanks for correcting me Martin, I omitted the release number mistake.
Martin
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are going to branch 4.0 today, and it is a good time to update our
> versioning scheme.
>
> I suggest to use the standard ovirt versioning, use by most projects:
>
> 1. master
>
> vdsm-4.19.0-201606011345.gitxxxyyy
>
> 2. 4.0
>
> vdsm-4.18.1
>
> The important invariant is that any build from master is considered newer
> compare with the stable builds, since master always contain all stable
> code, and new code.
>
> Second invariant, the most recent build from master is always newer compared
> with any other master build - the timestamp enforces this.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Nir
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel