On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Michal Skrivanek <mskrivan(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
I believe that introduction of bug 1413150 (Add warning to change CL to
the match the installed engine version) may have an unfortunate consequence
of people actually moving forward with the CL and DC without realizing the
constraints on running existing VMs. The periodic nagging is likely going
to make people run into the following issue even more frequently
Shall we note on cluster upgrade operation that the user should be aware of
the implications?
Do we know in advance those constraints and whether that are relevant in
the environment, and if it is then not issue the warning?
We have a cluster level override per VM which takes care of
compatibility
on CL update by setting the VM’s override to the original CL - that is
visible in VM properties, but that’s pretty much it, it’s not very
prominent at the moment and it can’t be searched on (bug 1454389). When the
update cluster change is made there is a dialog informing you, and there’s
also the pending config change for those running VMs…until you shut the VM
down, from that time on it only has the CL override set.
But the real problem is with DC which AFAIK does not have an override
capability, and currently does not have any checks for running VMs. With
the above mechanism you can easily get a VM with CL override (say. 3.6) and
mindlessly updated DC to 4.1…and once you stop such VM you won’t be able to
start it anymore as there is a proper check for unsupported 3.6 CL VM in a
newer DC (as implemented by bug 1436577 - Solve DC/Cluster upgrade of VMs
with now-unsupported custom compatibility level)
I don't recall. Do we have a warning on data center level as well? Or only
cluster level?
We either need to warn/block on DC upgrade, or implement some kind of a DC
override (I guess this is a storage question?)
(Similar to my question above), do we have a way to identify those
constraints and whether they are relevant in the environment? And if so,
block upgrading of the DC level?
Thoughts/ideas?
Thanks,
michal
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel