5:59 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
>> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>>>
>>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
>>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
>>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60
days (to
>>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower).
>>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their
>>>>>> closure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get
attention,
>>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old
patches"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Itamar
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
>>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>>>>>
>>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of
the
>>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the
maintainer,
>>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons
it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to
>>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like
>>>> that.
>>>
>>> This will be annoying.
>>>
>>> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
>>
>> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase,
>> nothing)?
>
>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:maste...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment
from any reviewer.
lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let
them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
Owner can close these if he likes.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing.
And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short cycle (can be even a
week).
2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
>>>
>>> Alon
>>>
>>
>>