----- Original Message -----
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
>> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>,
"engine-devel"
>>>> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>>>
>>>> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: "David Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>,
>>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches.
>>>>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched
over 60 days (to
>>>>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be
lower).
>>>>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post
their
>>>>>>>> closure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually
get
>>>>>>>> attention,
>>>>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of
old patches"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Itamar
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>>>>>>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the
age of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the
>>>>>>> maintainer,
>>>>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just
abandons it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all
subscribed to
>>>>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something
like
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will be annoying.
>>>>>
>>>>> And there are patches that pending with good reason.
>>>>
>>>> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase,
>>>> nothing)?
>>>
>>>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:maste...
>>
>> so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment
>> from any reviewer.
>> lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let
>> them get old and stay forever
>
> Again... maintainer can close these if he likes.
> Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why?
a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion
(rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc).
I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
At least we all agree on that old patches should be abandoned.
I think we can do this in a semi-automatic way. A cron job checks the
patch's freshness, and sends an email to warn the author and reviewers
of an old patch. If the someone has a good reason to keep the patch, he
can leave a comment on the gerrit web page saying "I want to #keep the
patch# because ...". Then the system skips the patches whose last
comment contains "#keep the patch#". If no one cares it, the patch is
abandoned after some time.
--
Thanks and best regards!
Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟
E-mail: zhshzhou(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
Telephone: 86-10-82454397