Re: [Engine-devel] host cpu feature
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
To: "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>, "engine-devel"
<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] host cpu feature
> Alternative idea, inspired by "Thus, if you hit any bugs, you are
> on
> your own" (http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPU wrt
> 'host-passthrough'):
> A config option to determine if we use host-model or
> host-passthrough.
> Y.
>
I do not think the engine should go to this level.
ie- it can ask for passthrough as a feature, and the
actual implementation is handled by vdsm.
If vdsm decides over host-passthrough or host-model, then how will the engine user know
what exactly his VM gets. I think vdsm must be told exactly what to do.