Thanks for the detailed explanation on the field initialization issues, Vojtech.
Looking at the common and compat packages, there a dozens of such initializers. Some are
probably redundant anyway and can safely be ignored, but some (most?) have a purpose.
My incline is always to prevent such issues from happening, and not rely on developers
having to remember to move their initializers.
Here's my take on the issue (patchset available for review at [1]):
- Move all member initializers to constructors
- Add a checkstyle check to ensure that new members aren't initialized inline
Reviews are welcome, thanks!
-Allon
[1]
From: "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs(a)redhat.com>
To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:17:30 PM
Subject: [Engine-devel] oVirt UI technology stack upgrade complete
Hello everyone,
last week, we merged a patch that upgrades oVirt UI technology stack to use
the latest version of Google Web Toolkit SDK and related modules [1]. This
patch includes all "essential" upgrade changes as described in [2].
After merging the above mentioned patch, we faced some issues related to GWT
RPC serialization, involving classes shared between frontend and backend.
Please read on to learn more about these issues and ways to fix them.
--
(A) NullPointerException at server-side (GWT RPC servlet) when serializing
backend business entity into RPC response payload
Symptoms
* exception in server.log -> Exception while dispatching incoming RPC call:
java.lang.NullPointerException
* error dialog in web UI with status code 500 (internal server error)
Root cause
* fields such as "private X field = Y;" of the given entity are not included
in GWT RPC serialization policy
* this happens when entity constructor isn't referenced in UI code -> GWT
compiler marks the constructor and instance initializer as dead code
* since instance initializer takes care of adding such fields to given type
(entity) in generated JavaScript, such fields won't be added at all
Workaround
* for each field such as "private X field = Y;"
1, change field declaration to "private X field;"
2, add "field = Y;" statement to constructor
Consequence
* even though constructor and instance initializer are marked as dead code,
fields such as "private X field;" are still added to given type (entity) in
generated JavaScript
* this is due to how generated JavaScript works, i.e. fields without
initialization statement such as "private X field;" are always added,
whereas fields with initialization statement such as "private X field = Y;"
are added via instance initializer (which might be removed if it's marked as
dead code)
References
* patch [
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/17352/] for RepoImage entity
--
(B) Instance field(s) with null values at server-side after deserializing RPC
request payload
Symptoms
* object passed from client contains field(s) with null values, despite
client initializing fields before making RPC call
Root cause
* client uses RPC method signature that works with type A, i.e.
VdcActionParametersBase
* type A meets GWT RPC serialization rules, as defined in [3] section
"Serializable User-defined Classes"
* client uses type B (extends A) when calling given RPC method at runtime,
i.e. MyCustomParameters
* type B does NOT meet GWT RPC serialization rules, i.e. missing no-arg
constructor
* back at server-side, GWT RPC servlet fails to deserialize type B properly
Workaround
* ensure all types participating in GWT RPC communication meet GWT RPC
serialization rules
1, assignable to IsSerializable or Serializable interface
2, all non-final & non-transient instance fields meet GWT RPC serialization
rules
3, contains no-arg constructor (in order to create instance during
deserialization)
References
* patch [
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/17368/] for Gluster Parameter classes
--
Regards,
Vojtech
[1]
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/16739/
[2]
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GWT_Platform_Upgrade
[3]
http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication.html#Dev...
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel