Il giorno mar 26 mar 2019 alle ore 14:42 Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
ha scritto:
Ok, maybe I've found something. I was comparing two sets of log
files -
one for basic-suite-4.3 run that succeeded and one that did not.
The deployment procedure for host-1 is not complete in the unsuccessful
case. The last log entry is:
2019-03-22 17:54:49,973-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[6f2e097b] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting vdsm.
In the successful case we can see:
2019-03-25 06:16:31,789-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting vdsm.
2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] Got: **%EventEnd STAGE closeup METHOD
otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vdsm.packages.Plugin._start
(odeploycons.packages.vdsm.started)
2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] Got: **%EventStart STAGE closeup METHOD
otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vmconsole.packages.Plugin._start (None)
2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] Got: ***L:INFO Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd
2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] nextEvent: Log INFO Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd
2019-03-25 06:16:38,261-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd.
2019-03-25 06:16:39,479-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] Got: **%EventEnd STAGE closeup METHOD
otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vmconsole.packages.Plugin._start (None)
...
It looks like ovirt-host-deploy plugin did not respond?
The timing of:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98762/
kinda aligns with my patch which was merged for vdsm-4.3 and was a suspect:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98748/
Sandro, are you aware of any issues on ovirt-host-deploy plugin that might
have caused these?
I don't really see how a patch touching the automation configuratin for
STDCI v2 can be the cause of this but please go ahead and blacklist last
build.
It should differ from previous one only by the timestamp of the rpm :-)
Dafna, can we temporarily blacklist the latest version of
ovirt-host-deploy to see if it fixes CQ?
Marcin
On 3/25/19 2:45 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
yes. I suspect this is the problem.
In the host I can see in the yum log the times the vdsm packages are
installed:
[dron@dron post-002_bootstrap.py]$ less
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1/_var_log/yum.log |grep vdsm
Mar 25 07:48:49 Installed: vdsm-api-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:48:52 Installed: vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:00 Installed: vdsm-common-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:00 Installed:
vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:38 Installed: vdsm-network-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.x86_64
Mar 25 07:49:38 Installed: vdsm-python-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed: vdsm-client-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed: vdsm-jsonrpc-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed: vdsm-http-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:42 Installed:
vdsm-hook-openstacknet-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:57 Installed:
vdsm-hook-vmfex-dev-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed: vdsm-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.x86_64
Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed:
vdsm-hook-ethtool-options-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed: vdsm-hook-fcoe-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
and in the engine you can see that the engine already failed installation:
2019-03-25 07:48:33,920-04 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Running command: AddVdsCommand
internal: false. Entities affected : ID: 319fcdf5-5941-46b1-a75c-d335bf500f82 Type:
ClusterAction group CREATE_HOST with role type ADMIN
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I am also adding didi
> should this not be logged in host-deploy?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:33 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Indeed in my failed job, I can see, that 'vdsm-python' is installed
>> *after* engine's attempt to run 'vdsm-tool':
>>
>> lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1/_var_log/yum.log
>> 403:Mar 22 17:54:12 Installed: vdsm-python-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>
>> lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine/_var_log/ovirt-engine/engine.log
>> 1580:2019-03-22 17:53:03,793-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[d86d9b56-2564-44a9-a8d4-01a4d7f5a529] Executing: '/usr/bin/vdsm-tool vdsm-id'
>> 1581:2019-03-22 17:53:04,043-04 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[d86d9b56-2564-44a9-a8d4-01a4d7f5a529] Failed to initiate vdsm-id request on host: Command
returned failure code 127 during SSH session 'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/19 2:22 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>
>> and its only failing on one host as well.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:17 PM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, that would suggest, that 'vdsm-tool' command is not found on
the
>>> host. There was no work done around 'vdsm-tool's 'vdsm-id'
recently.
>>> On 3/25/19 2:08 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, I can see in engine that it is trying to start vdsm
>>> installation on the host:
>>>
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) [] Entered
SsoRestApiAuthFilter
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter authenticating with sso
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter authenticating using BEARER header
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter successfully authenticated using BEARER header
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter] (default task-1) []
Entered SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,124-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter Not performing Negotiate Auth
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,143-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getclusterforuserbyclustername(?, ?, ?)}]
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,143-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetClusterForUserByClusterName] compiled
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,145-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: runQuery, params: [GetClusterByName,
NameQueryParameters:{refresh='false', filtered='false'}], timeElapsed:
7ms
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,161-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [] Compiled stored procedure. Call string is [{call
getvmstaticbyname(?)}]
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,161-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [] SqlCall for procedure [GetVmStaticByName] compiled
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,206-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getvdsbyname(?)}]
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,206-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetVdsByName] compiled
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,223-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: getByName, params:
[lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1], timeElapsed: 20ms
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,225-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getvdsbyhostname(?)}]
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,225-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetVdsByHostName] compiled
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,252-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: getAllForHostname, params:
[lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1], timeElapsed: 28ms
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,254-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getstorage_poolsbyclusterid(?)}]
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,254-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[Getstorage_poolsByClusterId] compiled
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,262-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Connecting
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,461-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Connected:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,467-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Authenticating:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,599-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Authenticated:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,600-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Executing: '/usr/bin/vdsm-tool
vdsm-id'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,902-04 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Failed to initiate vdsm-id request on host: Command
returned failure code 127 during SSH session 'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,920-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Running command: AddVdsCommand internal: false.
Entities affected : ID: 319fcdf5-5941-46b1-a75c-d335bf500f82 Type: ClusterAction group
CREATE_HOST with role type ADMIN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:53 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> we have another failing patch with the same test:
>>>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/360/
>>>>
>>>> its obviously not related to the patch but there is something that is
>>>> causing these failures randomly.
>>>> From what I can see in the current failed job, you are correct and
>>>> host-1 and engine does not even try to deploy host-1.
>>>>
>>>> i can see host-1 is getting error 127 in lago for ntpd and I can see
>>>> network manager errors in the host messages log
>>>>
>>>> In the host messages log I can see several messages that I suspect may
>>>> cause issues in communication between engine and host:
>>>>
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:09 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 sasldblistusers2:
>>>> _sasldb_getkeyhandle has failed
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 saslpasswd2: error
>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data
pair
>>>> found
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 saslpasswd2: error
>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data
pair
>>>> found
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 saslpasswd2: error
>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data
pair
>>>> found
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ces/12)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-UMJa2S is being created...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-UMJa2S is being deleted...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 NetworkManager[2658]:
>>>> <info> [1553514613.7774] manager: (bondscan-UMJa2S): new Bond
device
>>>> (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/13)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: (unregistered
>>>> net_device) (unregistering): Released all slaves
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being created...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option fail_over_mac: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option ad_select: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option lacp_rate: mode dependency failed, not supported in mode
>>>> balance-rr(0)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option arp_validate: invalid value (7)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option xmit_hash_policy: invalid value (5)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 NetworkManager[2658]:
>>>> <info> [1553514613.8002] manager: (bondscan-liwvMR): new Bond
device
>>>> (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/14)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option primary_reselect: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option arp_all_targets: invalid value (2)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being deleted...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: (unregistered
>>>> net_device) (unregistering): Released all slaves
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being created...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option fail_over_mac: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option ad_select: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option lacp_rate: mode dependency failed, not supported in mode
>>>> active-backup(1)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option arp_validate: invalid value (7)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 NetworkManager[2658]:
>>>> <info> [1553514613.8429] manager: (bondscan-liwvMR): new Bond
device
>>>> (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/15)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option xmit_hash_policy: invalid value (5)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option primary_reselect: invalid value (3)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bondscan-liwvMR:
>>>> option arp_all_targets: invalid value (2)
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: bonding:
>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being deleted...
>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 kernel: (unregistered
>>>> net_device) (unregistering): Released all slaves
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:24 AM Marcin Sobczyk
<msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For the failed job, the engine didn't even try to deploy on
host-1:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/339/artifact/...
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin, do you know what could be the reason for that?
>>>>>
>>>>> I can see in the logs for both successful and unsuccessful
>>>>> basic-suite-4.3 runs, that there is no 'ntpdate' on host-1:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:46,350::ssh.py::ssh::58::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Running
d0c49b54 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1: ntpdate -4 lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:46,383::ssh.py::ssh::81::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command
d0c49b54 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 returned with 127
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:46,384::ssh.py::ssh::96::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command
d0c49b54 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 errors:
>>>>> bash: ntpdate: command not found
>>>>>
>>>>> On host-0 everything is ok:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:46,917::ssh.py::ssh::58::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Running
d11b2a64 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0: ntpdate -4 lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:53,088::ssh.py::ssh::81::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command
d11b2a64 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0 returned with 0
>>>>> 2019-03-25 10:14:53,088::ssh.py::ssh::89::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command
d11b2a64 on lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0 output:
>>>>> 25 Mar 06:14:53 ntpdate[6646]: adjust time server 192.168.202.2
offset 0.017150 sec
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/25/19 10:13 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Still fails, now on a different component. ( ovirt-web-ui-extentions
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/339/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:59 PM Dan Kenigsberg
<danken(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:21 PM Marcin Sobczyk
<msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dafna,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in 'verify_add_hosts' we specifically wait for single
host to be up
>>>>>>> with a timeout:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 144 up_hosts =
hosts_service.list(search='datacenter={} AND status=up'.format(DC_NAME))
>>>>>>> 145 if len(up_hosts):
>>>>>>> 146 return True
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The log files say, that it took ~50 secs for one of the hosts
to be
>>>>>>> up (seems reasonable) and no timeout is being reported.
>>>>>>> Just after running 'verify_add_hosts', we run
>>>>>>> 'add_master_storage_domain', which calls
'_hosts_in_dc' function.
>>>>>>> That function does the exact same check, but it fails:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 113 hosts = hosts_service.list(search='datacenter={}
AND status=up'.format(dc_name))
>>>>>>> 114 if hosts:
>>>>>>> 115 if random_host:
>>>>>>> 116 return random.choice(hosts)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think it is relevant to our current failure; but
I consider
>>>>>> random_host=True as a bad practice. As if we do not have enough
moving
>>>>>> parts, we are adding intentional randomness. Reproducibility is
far more
>>>>>> important than coverage - particularly for a shared system test
like OST.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 117 else:
>>>>>>> 118 return sorted(hosts, key=lambda host:
host.name)
>>>>>>> 119 raise RuntimeError('Could not find hosts that
are up in DC %s' % dc_name)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm also not able to reproduce this issue locally on my
server. The
>>>>>>> investigation continues...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that it would be fair to take the filtering by host
state
>>>>>> out of Engine and into the test, where we can easily log the
current status
>>>>>> of each host. Then we'd have better understanding on the next
failure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/22/19 1:17 PM, Marcin Sobczyk wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sure, I'm on it - it's weird though, I did ran 4.3
basic suite for
>>>>>>> this patch manually and everything was ok.
>>>>>>> On 3/22/19 1:05 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are failing branch 4.3 for test:
>>>>>>> 002_bootstrap.add_master_storage_domain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems that in one of the hosts, the vdsm is not starting
>>>>>>> there is nothing in vdsm.log or in supervdsm.log
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CQ identified this patch as the suspected root cause:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98748/ - vdsm: client: Add
support
>>>>>>> for flow id
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Milan, Marcin, can you please have a look?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> full logs:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/326/artifact/b...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the only error I can see is about host not being up (makes
sense as
>>>>>>> vdsm is not running)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stacktrace
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py",
line 369, in run
>>>>>>> testMethod()
>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest
>>>>>>> self.test(*self.arg)
>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 142, in
wrapped_test
>>>>>>> test()
>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 60, in wrapper
>>>>>>> return func(get_test_prefix(), *args, **kwargs)
>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 417, in add_master_storage_domain
>>>>>>> add_iscsi_storage_domain(prefix)
>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 561, in add_iscsi_storage_domain
>>>>>>> host=_random_host_from_dc(api, DC_NAME),
>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 122, in _random_host_from_dc
>>>>>>> return _hosts_in_dc(api, dc_name, True)
>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 119, in _hosts_in_dc
>>>>>>> raise RuntimeError('Could not find hosts that are up
in DC %s' % dc_name)
>>>>>>> 'Could not find hosts that are up in DC
test-dc\n-------------------- >> begin captured logging <<
--------------------\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: start task:937bdea7-a2a3-47ad-9383-36647ea37ddf:Get
ssh client for lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine:\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: end
task:937bdea7-a2a3-47ad-9383-36647ea37ddf:Get ssh client for
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine:\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Running c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine: cat /root/multipath.txt\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Command c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine returned with 0\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Command c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine output:\n
3600140516f88cafa71243648ea218995\n360014053e28f60001764fed9978ec4b3\n360014059edc777770114a6484891dcf1\n36001405d93d8585a50d43a4ad0bd8d19\n36001405e31361631de14bcf87d43e55a\n\n-----------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/J4NCHXTK5ZY...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/ULS4OKU2YZF...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Eyal edri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MANAGER
>>>>>
>>>>> RHV/CNV DevOps
>>>>>
>>>>> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>> <
https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
>>>>> <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018
>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/XOP6ZCUIDUV...
>>>>>
>>>>
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <