5:29 p.m.
On 05/10/2012 05:16 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Miki Kenneth" <mkenneth(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen(a)redhat.com>, "Saggi Mizrahi"
<smizrahi(a)redhat.com>, "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>,
> "Simon Grinberg" <sgrinber(a)redhat.com>, "Eldan Hildesheim"
<ehildesh(a)redhat.com>, "Eldan Hildesheim"
> <info(a)eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub" <achub(a)redhat.com>,
engine-devel(a)ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya" <hateya(a)redhat.com>,
> "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:14:32 AM
> Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>
> On 05/10/2012 04:46 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
>> we should had a mouseover tooltip for explaining what is PosixFS
>> and mentioned that it is supported only in 3.1 cluster.
>> Miki
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Einav Cohen" <ecohen(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>, "Ayal
Baron"
>>> <abaron(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" <smizrahi(a)redhat.com>, "Andrew
Cathrow"
>>> <acathrow(a)redhat.com>, "Miki Kenneth"
>>> <mkenneth(a)redhat.com>, "Simon Grinberg"
<sgrinber(a)redhat.com>,
>>> "Eldan Hildesheim" <ehildesh(a)redhat.com>, "Eldan
>>> Hildesheim" <info(a)eldanet.com>, "Alexey Chub"
<achub(a)redhat.com>,
>>> engine-devel(a)ovirt.org, "Haim Ateya"
>>> <hateya(a)redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:28:31 PM
>>> Subject: Re: PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:21:42 PM
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/2012 04:16 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
>>>>> Please review the mock-ups on the feature page:
>>>>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/PosixFSConnection#Changes_in_GUI
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> From talking to Haim I understood that path should include ":"
>>>
>>> From talking to Ayal, the path can be similar in its format to a
>>> path
>>> provided when creating an NFS storage domain (e.g.
>>> "server:/dir1/dir2"), *or* to a path provided when creating a
>>> Local
>>> storage domain (e.g. "/tmp/dir3"), meaning, without ":".
>>> @Ayal - any chance for a clarification here?
> This is important - it may yield a change to REST-API.
> Ayal?
The validation should be not empty, after than anything goes.
Ori - this means we
should model REST-API differently, and not as I
thought (current REST-API implementation will not be able to pass
mountSpec without ":" to backend).
I will summon a meeting on Sunday to close that ASAP
>
>>>
>>>> In addition - if we only support V1, why add the combo box?
>>>
>>> We are always showing the combo-box, even if we have only one
>>> option
>>> in it (so the user will know what is the value that is being
>>> sent).
>>> However, we disable it. I updated the mock-up to clarify this.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Einav
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>