Re: [ovirt-devel] Fwd: Re: Mass bug: packages should not auto-enable systemd units

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: > > Due to some confusion around how alternatives worked, I screwed up the > list of packages here. I've updated it below. I'll give it a few > more days before filing the actual bugs. > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto(a)mit.edu&gt; wrote: >> Hi everyone- >> >> This is a notice in accordance with the mass bug filing procedure. >> >> A number of packages install systemd units and enable them >> automatically. They should not. Please update these packages to use the >> macroized scriptlet >> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd). >> >> If your package has an exception from FESCo permitting it to enable >> itself, please make sure that the service in question is listed in the >> appropriate preset file. >> >> There is a general exception described here: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default >> >> If your package falls under the general exception, then it is possible >> that no change is required. Nevertheless, if you are relying on the >> exception, please make sure that your rpm scripts are sensible. The >> exception is: >> >> In addition, any service which does not remain persistent on the >> system (aka, it "runs once then goes away"), does not listen to >> incoming connections during initialization, and does not require >> configuration to be functional may be enabled by default (but is not >> required to do so). An example of "runs once then goes away" service >> is iptables. >> >> Given that this issue can affect Fedora 20 users who install your >> package as a dependency, these bugs should be fixed in Fedora 20 and >> Rawhide. >> >> The tracker bug is here: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090684 >> >> I created it early because three of the bugs are pre-existing. Next >> week, I'll file bugs against the packages below. If you fix your >> package in the mean time, please let me know. >> >> After three weeks, provenpackagers may step in and fix these issues. >> Vinzenz, I suppose that your main point is this part of the list > vdsm Douglas/Yaniv - can infra take care of this?